The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Females Have a Greater Incidence of Stress Fractures Than Males in Both Military and Athletic Populations: A Systemic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review incidence of stress fractures in military and athlete populations and identify factors explaining causes and differences in the incidence among genders. METHODS: Searches were conducted using several major databases. The studies were included if they were original studies including both male and female subjects and their aim was to identify incidence rates and risk factors contributing to the development of stress fractures. Of several thousand studies, 11 focusing on military populations and 10 on athletes are discussed. RESULTS: In both populations, females had higher incidence of stress fractures, with incidence of approximately 3% and approximately 9.2% for males and females, respectively, in military populations and approximately 6.5% and approximately 9.7%, respectively, in athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Factors possibly explaining why females are more susceptible to stress fractures include bone anatomy, lower aerobic capacity, smaller muscle, and poor diet. However, both female recruits and athletes with normal weight and bone health are less likely to develop stress fractures, showing that gender is less important than the overall physical shape/condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low energy availability, not stress of exercise, alters LH pulsatility in exercising women
Loucks, A. B., Verdun, M., Heath, E. M., & (With the Technical Assistance of T. Law, S. A. J. R. T. (1998) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.37 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Weaver, C. M., Gordon, C. M., Janz, K. F., Kalkwarf, H. J., Lappe, J. M., Lewis, R., O’Karma, M., Wallace, T. C., & Zemel, B. S. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3 · Cited by 1,378
Areta, J. L., Taylor, H. L., & Koehler, K. (2021) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04516-0 · Cited by 214
Effects of reduced energy availability on bone metabolism in women and men
Papageorgiou, M., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Parsons, A., Tang, J. C. Y., Greeves, J. P., Fraser, W. D., & Sale, C. (2017) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.019 · Cited by 159
Low Energy Availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: What Coaches Should Know
Charlton, B. T., Forsyth, S., & Clarke, D. C. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541211054458 · Cited by 36
Holtzman, B., Popp, K. L., Tenforde, A. S., Parziale, A. L., Taylor, K., & Ackerman, K. E. (2022) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12821 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Wentz, L., Liu, P.-Y., Haymes, E., & Ilich, J. Z.
- Venue
- Military Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 420-430
- ISSN
- 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-613X
- OpenAlex
- W1969733767
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Females Have a Greater Incidence of Stress Fractures Than Males in Both Military and Athletic Populations: A Systemic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7205/milmed-d-10-00322
- The paper
- Wentz, L., Liu, P.-Y., Haymes, E., & Ilich, J. Z. (2011). Females Have a Greater Incidence of Stress Fractures Than Males in Both Military and Athletic Populations: A Systemic Review. Military Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-10-00322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.