Cited by 27Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in U.S. military personnel with sleep apnea improves sleepiness, sleep quality, and depressive symptoms

Mysliwiec, Vincent, Capaldi, Vincent F., Gill, Jessica, Baxter, Tristin, O'Reilly, Brian M., Matsangas, Panagiotis, Roth, Bernard J.·2015·Military Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is frequently diagnosed in U.S. military personnel. OSA is associated with sleepiness, poor sleep quality, and service-related illnesses of insomnia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Observational study of active duty military personnel with OSA and adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) assessed with smart chip technology. RESULTS: 58 men with mean age 36.2 ± 7.7 years, mean body mass index 31.4 ± 3.7 with mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 19.1 ± 19.0 are reported. 23 (39.7%) participants were adherent to PAP, and 35 (60.3%) were nonadherent. No significant differences in baseline demographics, apnea-hypopnea index, service-related illnesses, or clinical instrument scores. Military personnel adherent to PAP had significantly improved sleepiness (p = 0.007), sleep quality (p = 0.013), depressive symptoms (p = 0.01), energy/fatigue (p = 0.027), and emotional well-being (p = 0.024). Participants with moderate-severe OSA were more likely to be in the adherent group when compared with participants diagnosed with mild OSA. CONCLUSIONS: Military personnel with OSA have low adherence to PAP. Adherence is associated with improved depressive symptoms, sleepiness, sleep quality, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Future research should focus on interventions to improve the management of OSA in military personnel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-14-00197

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mysliwiec, V., Capaldi, V. F., Gill, J., Baxter, T., O'Reilly, B. M., Matsangas, P., & Roth, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Madigan Army Medical Center (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Naval Postgraduate School (US)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2015-04
Volume
180
Issue
4
Pages
475-482
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2126478215
Cited by
27
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, positive airway pressure, medication adherence, military personnel, sleepiness, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, fatigue, emotional well-being, apnea-hypopnea index
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Fatigue, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Patient Compliance, Sleep, United States, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review