Cited by 564Race, History, and American SocietyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Black and White Styles in Conflict

Kochman, Thomas·1981·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226112251.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communication in reference interactions is always imbued with power dynamics shaped by racialized identity and cultural practices.

    “In these intimate interactions, communication is always imbued with power dynamics, which are shaped by racialized identity (Hill, 2008;Kochman, 1981) and cultural practices (Jackson, 2014, p. 217;Kubota, 2012).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kochman, T.
Corresponding author
Kochman, Thomas
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
1981
OpenAlex
W4300943435
Cited by
564
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.04
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
racial conflict, race relations, racial identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review