Cited by 415Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactConsumer Market Behavior and PricingLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices

Open access
Gordon, Robert J.·1990·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Abstract

1.The following PPI indexes for household appliances are used within the "service industry machinery" subcomponent of PDE.The following are the PPI indexes used and their percentage weights within the service industry machinery component in 1967 and 1981 (the source of the table is unpublished BEA worksheets):Chapter Seven attention here (refrigerators, air conditioners, washers, and dryers) made up 72 percent of the value of major appliances in 1949 and 53 percent in 1983.Refngerators alone constituted 45 percent of the value of major appliances in 1949, but only 25 percent in 1983.In the major appliance category, the only important product not covered in this chapter is the kitchen range.In turn, major appliances accounted for 39.8 percent of all products listed in 1949 and for 32.9 percent in 1983, with the decline largely due to the growing importance of "brown goods," particularly TV sets and VCRs, both of which are covered here.The very rapidly declining price indexes for electronic computers developed in the last chapter and by other investigators suggest that quality changes may have been more pervasive in consumer electronic goods than in major appliances.This fact, and the growing importance of electronic goods evident in table 7.1, from 20.6 percent of the total in 1949 to 45.4 percent in 1983, suggests that some attention must be paid to electronic products in this chapter.This task is inherently difficult, however, since many of the dimensions over which quality has improved, for example, picture quality, are difficult to quantify within the context of the hedonic regression technique.Although most of the space in this chapter is devoted to appliances, considerable attention is devoted to the development of a CR index for TV sets, and a briefer treatment of VCRs is included as well.3The right-hand two columns in table 7.1 exhibit unit values for each major product category in 1949 and 1983.Changes in these unit values can be compared with changes in the PPI for the same products over the same period.If both the unit value and the PPI doubled, this would imply that quality per unit remained unchanged, while if the unit value doubled and the PPI remained fixed, the quality per unit implied by the PPI would have doubled.The following are the (logarithmic) annual rates of change of unit values, the PPI for each product, and the implied PPI quality per unit over the 1949-83 interval: Unit Value PPI Quality per Unit Refrigerators 2.95 1.36 1.59 Air conditioners (PPI used 1953-63) 0.31 0.35 -0.05Home laundry (used PPI for washing machines) 2.69 1.73 0.96 Video (used CPI for TV sets, 1950-83) -0.05 -1.40 1.35These implied growth rates of quality per unit raise intriguing questions.Could video equipment really have increased in quality at a slower rate than 3. Another reason for devoting less attention to electronic goods is that they are primarily manufactured abroad, and thus, while entering the deflators for consumer and producers durable expenditures, are netted out of the GNP deflator.Thus, any bias in official price indexes for consumer electronic goods would have little effect on aggregate measures of the growth rates of output and productivity.1 1 .The January 1952 CR evaluation estimates that the presence of refrigerator defrost added $50 in that year.This is 16 percent of the mean price of $306.91 for the models not equipped with automatic refrigerator defrost evaluated in the October 195 1 issue.'Indicates significance at the 5 percent level.**Indicates significance at the 1 percent level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226304601.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The annual rate of price decline between 1972 and 1987 would have been 35 percent per annum, rather than 20 percent per annum, if the transitional benefit from mainframes to personal computers had been taken into account.

    “Gordon (1990, p. 239) calculates that the annual rate of price decline between 1972 and 1987 would have been 35 percent per annum, rather than 20 percent per annum, if this transitional benefit had been taken into account.”

    From Does the “New Economy” Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past? (2000) · cites this paper as Gordon (1990)

    The available passages from the Preface (pp. 2–4) discuss computer-price research but give no calculation for 1972–1987 or comparison of 35% and 20% annual price declines. Searches for those figures and the mainframe-to-personal-computer transition returned only Preface passages; the cited p. 239 was not available to assess. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gordon, R. J.
Corresponding author
Gordon, Robert J.
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
1990
OpenAlex
W4320801084
Cited by
415
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.52
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
price indices, household appliances, consumer electronics, television receivers, video cassette recorder, quality changes, hedonic pricing, unit value, consumer price index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review