Cited by 341Outsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementInformation Technology Governance and StrategyMerger and Competition Analysis

Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data

Open access
Hitt, Lorin M.·1999·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Previous literature has suggested that information technology (IT) can affect firm boundaries by changing the costs of coordinating economic activity within and between firms (internal and external coordination). This paper examines the empirical relationship between IT and firm structure and evaluates whether this structure is consistent with prior arguments about IT and coordination. We formulate an empirical model to relate the use of information technology capital to vertical integration and diversification. This model is tested using an 8-year panel data set of information technology capital stock, firm structure, and relevant control variables for 549 large firms. Overall, increased use of IT is found to be associated with substantial decreases in vertical integration and weak increases in diversification. In addition, firms that are less vertically integrated and more diversified have a higher demand for IT capital. While we cannot rule out all alternative explanations for these results, they are consistent with previous theoretical arguments that both internal and external coordination costs are reduced by IT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.10.2.134

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The greater the scope of business, the more likelihood enterprises invest to digitalize operations and to reduce internal co-ordination costs, administrative complexities, and information processing.

    “Scholars describe SBO as an adoption predicator; the greater the scope of business, the more likelihood enterprises invest to digitalize operations and to reduce internal co-ordination costs, administrative complexities, and information processing (Bakos, 1998;Chopra & Meindl, 2001;Hitt, 1999;Zhu et al., 2003).”
  • The role of SBO as an adoption predicator has been variously confirmed.

    “The role of SBO as an adoption predicator has been variously confirmed (Hitt, 1999;Thong, 1999;Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990;Zhu et al., 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hitt, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Hitt, Lorin M.
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
1999-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
134-149
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W1973836970
Cited by
341
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
firm boundaries, vertical integration, diversification, corporate structure, large corporations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review