Cited by 81Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesIndian and Buddhist StudiesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Sinister Yogis

White, David Gordon·2009·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226895154.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The powers of divine existence can be misused, as Indian narratives contain many examples of questionable conduct by powerful ascetics and yogins.

    “The powers afforded by the divine mode of existence, in fact, might provide opportunities for abuse-Indian narrative literature offers many examples of questionable behavior on the part of powerful ascetics and yogins (White 2009).”

    From Buddhist Meditation and the Ethics of Human Augmentation (2020) · cites this paper as White 2009

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, D. G.
Corresponding author
White, David Gordon
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2009
OpenAlex
W4253692850
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review