An Intelligence in Our Image: The Risks of Bias and Errors in Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence influence many aspects of life today and have gained an aura of objectivity and infallibility. The use of these tools introduces a new level of risk and complexity in policy. This report illustrates some of the shortcomings of algorithmic decisionmaking, identifies key themes around the problem of algorithmic errors and bias, and examines some approaches for combating these problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI systems can make systemic and random errors.
“As will be discussed below, AI systems can make systemic and random errors [70, 174].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [174]
Cites
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812 · see citing works
Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI
Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2026621 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Man Tang, P., Koopman, J., McClean, S. T., Zhang, J. H., Li, C. H., De Cremer, D., Lu, Y., & Ng, C. T. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1516 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Magrabi, F., Ammenwerth, E., McNair, J. B., De Keizer, N. F., Hyppönen, H., Nykänen, P., Rigby, M., Scott, P. J., Vehko, T., Wong, Z. S.-Y., et al. (2019) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677903 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation
Choudhury, P., Starr, E., & Agarwal, R. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3152 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Recht, M. P., Dewey, M., Dreyer, K., Langlotz, C., Niessen, W., Prainsack, B., & Smith, J. J. (2020) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06672-5 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“5.7).”
InfluentialAlgorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities
Lim, H. S. M., & Taeihagh, A. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205791 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Education: A Systematic Scoping Review of Interventions
Kirubarajan, A., Young, D., Khan, S., Crasto, N., Sobel, M., & Sussman, D. (2022) · Journal of Surgical Education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.09.012 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Environmentally sustainable development and use of artificial intelligence in health care
Richie, C. (2022) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.13018 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Warfare: A Perfect Storm of Instability?
Johnson, J. (2020) · The Washington Quarterly · doi:10.1080/0163660x.2020.1770968 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Considerations for a more ethical approach to data in AI: On data representation and infrastructure
Baird, A., & Schuller, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.00025 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Arar, K., Tlili, A., Schunka, L., Salha, S., & Saiti, A. (2025) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700763.2025.2451982 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Hello me, meet the real me: Voice synthesis attacks on voice assistants
Bilika, D., Michopoulou, N., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103617 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A step toward building a unified framework for managing AI bias
Rana, S. A., Azizul, Z. H., & Awan, A. A. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1630 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Osoba, O., & Welser, W.
- ORCID
- Osoba, Osonde
- Venue
- RAND Corporation eBooks
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2616399473
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 30.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RAND Corporation eBooks (publishedVersion)
- International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, algorithmic errors, machine learning, algorithmic accountability, policy implications, fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review