Cited by 326Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in LawDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

An Intelligence in Our Image: The Risks of Bias and Errors in Artificial Intelligence

Osoba, Osonde, Welser, William·2017·RAND Corporation eBooks

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence influence many aspects of life today and have gained an aura of objectivity and infallibility. The use of these tools introduces a new level of risk and complexity in policy. This report illustrates some of the shortcomings of algorithmic decisionmaking, identifies key themes around the problem of algorithmic errors and bias, and examines some approaches for combating these problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7249/rr1744

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osoba, O., & Welser, W.
Venue
RAND Corporation eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2616399473
Cited by
326
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
30.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • RAND Corporation eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, algorithmic errors, machine learning, algorithmic accountability, policy implications, fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review