The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The military has long utilized and experimented with AI in their forces, such as creating HATs for sectors involving intelligence gathering and analysis, decision making, and cyber defense (Morgan et al., 2020).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Morgan et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Oniani, D., Hilsman, J., Peng, Y., Poropatich, R. K., Pamplin, J. C., Legault, G. L., & Wang, Y. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00965-x · Cited by 143
Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences
Deranty, J.-P., & Corbin, T. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x · Cited by 118
International Governance of Civilian AI: A Jurisdictional Certification Approach
Trager, R., Harack, B., Reuel, A., Carnegie, A., Heim, L., Ho, L., Kreps, S., Lall, R., Larter, O., hÉigeartaigh, S. Ó., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15514 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, F., Boudreaux, B., Lohn, A., Ashby, M., Curriden, C., Klima, K., & Grossman, D.
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 2020
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7249/rr3139
- The paper
- Morgan, F., Boudreaux, B., Lohn, A., Ashby, M., Curriden, C., Klima, K., & Grossman, D. (2020). Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr3139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
