Cited by 39Colonialism, slavery, and tradeRace, History, and American SocietyHistory of Colonial Brazil

What Slaveholders Think: How Contemporary Perpetrators Rationalize What They Do

Choi-Fitzpatrick, Austin·2017·Columbia University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7312/choi18182

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 'Freedom' for non-slaves has been far from absolute in many contexts, with personal and impersonal forces impinging upon personal liberty in a variety of ways.

    “' Freedom ' for non-slaves has been far from absolute in many contexts, with personal and impersonal forces impinging upon personal liberty in a variety of ways (see O ' Connell Davidson 2015; Landman 2018; Choi-Fitzpatrick 2017).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi-Fitzpatrick, A.
Corresponding author
Choi-Fitzpatrick, Austin
Venue
Columbia University Press eBooks
Published
2017-02-23
OpenAlex
W2982634132
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › History of Colonial Brazil
Keywords
slaveholders, slavery, slavery in the United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review