Cited by 46Phytoestrogen effects and researchNutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and Factors

Study on soy isoflavone consumption and risk of breast cancer and survival

Open access
Kang, Hong-Bin, Zhang, Ya-Feng, Yang, Jin-Dun, Lu, Kuan-Liang·2012·Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Abstract

Aim Isoflavones in soy foods are part of a larger class of flayonoid compounds that have have been demonstrated to be potent dietary anti-cancer agents, and the effect of soy intake on the survival of ovarian cancer is conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to explore the whether soy intake is related to the risk of death of breast cancer. Methods A prospective study was conducted. A total of 256 patients included in this study had breast cancer and were recruited between January 2004 and January 2006. All of them were followed up from since January 2011. A univariate Cox's regression analysis was used to assess the association between soy intake and survival. Results The education level, menopausal status, ER/PR status and TNM stage were significant difference in the survival of breast cancer. The highest soy isoflavone was associated with a decreased death risk of breast cancer (OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.09-0.54). Moreover, the higher consumption of soy protein also presented a trend decreased breast cancer risk, and the highest consumption significantly reduced the cancer risk compared with the lowest consumption (OR=0.38, 95% CI=0.17-0.86). Conclusion The present study suggests soy intake is associated with a significant reduced death risk of breast cancer in Chinese population. Further large sample studies are warranted to confirm the inverse association of soy consumption and breast cancer survival by menopausal status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.3.995

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of seven prospective studies examining survival, four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients.

    “Of seven studies examining survival [94,96,98,100,101,106,112], four (57%) showed protective effects on breast cancer mortality or mortality in breast cancer patients [94,96,101,112].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, H.-B., Zhang, Y.-F., Yang, J.-D., & Lu, K.-L.
Venue
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2012-03-31
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
995-998
ISSN
1513-7368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170906480
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
soy isoflavones, soy consumption, breast cancer, breast cancer survival, soy protein, dietary phytoestrogens, menopausal status, Chinese population
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Neoplasm Staging, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Soy Foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review