The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing Clinical Competence.
Open accessAbstract
Rubella antibody screeningSir, Redhead and colleagues adopted the prag- matic approach suggested by the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee in the United States of America with respect to screening for rubella immunity.'The committee endors- es the view that a documented history of rubella vaccination can be considered presumptive evidence of immunity.2A retrospective survey of women aged between 16 and 39 years found to be rubella susceptible (that is, not immune) on opportunistic screening was carried out.The setting was a rural practice with a list size of 4600 patients.A list of women who were found to be susceptible to rubel- la was generated using a search of com- puterized patient records.The results of the computer search were checked against the written notes.Data were available from April 1988 until April 1994.During this period 559 women had been screened and 12 had been found to be susceptible to rubella.The notes of these 12 women were then reviewed and it was found that eight of them had a record in their notes of previous rubella vaccination.It would therefore appear unwise to assume that a documented history of vac- cination against rubella implies immunity in all women; repeated screening of rubel- la status is still required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
Martin, J. A., Regehr, G., Reznick, R., Macrae, H., Murnaghan, J., Hutchison, C., & Brown, M. (1997) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800840237 · Cited by 2,527
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications
Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1996) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/bf00596229 · Cited by 1,247
Use of Peer Ratings to Evaluate Physician Performance
Ramsey, P. G. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500130069034 · Cited by 347
Defining characteristics of educational competencies
Albanese, M. A., Mejicano, G., Mullan, P., Kokotailo, P., & Gruppen, L. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02996.x · Cited by 299
Performance-Based Assessment: Lessons from the Health Professions
Swanson, D. B., Norman, G. R., & Linn, R. L. (1995) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1177072 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1985-04-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-569
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W590879719
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Clinical Competence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-569_2
- The paper
- Assessing Clinical Competence. (1985). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-569_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.