The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intestinal Decontamination for Control of Nosocomial Multiresistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Study of an Outbreak in an Intensive Care Unit
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of intestinal decontamination by oral nonabsorbable antibiotic agents to control a nosocomial outbreak of intestinal colonization and infection with multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae, and to examine its effects on endemic nosocomial infection rates. DESIGN: A 10-week prospective incidence study (group 1), and then an 8-week randomized, open trial of intestinal decontamination (groups 2 and 3). SETTING: A medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with unit stay of over 2 days and a severity score at admission of more than 2; 124 patients were included in group 1, 50 in group 2 (control), and 36 in group 3 (intestinal decontamination). INTERVENTIONS: Neomycin, polymyxin E, and nalidixic acid were given to group 3 patients throughout their stay in the unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intestinal colonization with multiresistant strains occurred in 19.6% of patients in group 1, at a mean of 16 days after admission, and preceded detection in clinical samples by a mean of 11 days. During the decontamination trial, intestinal colonization rates decreased to 10% (group 2), and 3% (group 3) (P = 0.12 and P less than 0.01, compared with group 1, respectively). Corresponding infection rates were 9% (group 1), 3% (group 2), and 0 (group 3). No new cases were detected in the following 4 months. The intestinal colonization rate with gram-positive cocci was higher in group 3 than group 2 (P less than 0.001). The overall rate of nosocomial infections was at 28% (group 1), 33% (group 2), and 32% (group 3). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal decontamination can help to control an outbreak of intestinal colonization and infection with multiresistant gram-negative bacilli in the intensive care unit, but should not be recommended for routine prevention of endemic nosocomial infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Population Perspective
Lipsitch, M., & Samore, M. H. (2002) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0804.010312 · Cited by 497
Moher, D., Pham, B., Lawson, M., & Klassen, T. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7410 · Cited by 500
BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., BONTEN, M. J. M., GAILLARD, C. A., PALING, J. C., van der GEEST, S., van TIEL, F. H., BEYSENS, A. J., de LEEUW, P. W., & STOBBERINGH, E. E. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2005003 · Cited by 339
Daneman, N., Sarwar, S., Fowler, R. A., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70322-5 · Cited by 288
Silvestri, L., de la Cal, M. A., & van Saene, H. K. F. (2012) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2690-1 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Brun-Buisson, C., Legrand, P., Rauss, A., Richard, C., Montravers, F., Besbes, M., Meakins, J. L., Soussy, C. J., & Lemaire, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 873-881
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1964216371
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal Decontamination for Control of Nosocomial Multiresistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Study of an Outbreak in an Intensive Care Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-873
- The paper
- Brun-Buisson, C., Legrand, P., Rauss, A., Richard, C., Montravers, F., Besbes, M., Meakins, J. L., Soussy, C. J., & Lemaire, F. (1989). Intestinal Decontamination for Control of Nosocomial Multiresistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Study of an Outbreak in an Intensive Care Unit. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.