The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abdominal Obesity and Breast Cancer Risk
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if body fat distribution affects breast cancer risk. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. PATIENTS: The anthropometric measurements of 216 consecutively and newly diagnosed women with invasive carcinoma of the breast were compared with those of 432 age-matched controls. The anthropometric measurements taken were abdomen, thigh, suprailiac, biceps, triceps, subscapular, and midaxillary skinfolds; waist and hip circumference; and weight and height. Women between 25 and 83 years of age were included in the study. RESULTS: Patients with breast cancer had a significantly greater waist:hip circumference ratio than controls (P less than 0.001) and a significantly greater suprailiac:thigh skinfold ratio (P less than 0.001). The relative risk for breast cancer increased with increasing waist:hip circumference ratio (less than 0.73 = 1.00; 0.73 to 76 = 1.90; 0.77 to 0.80 = 2.83; greater than 0.80 = 6.46) and with suprailiac:thigh skinfold ratio (less than 0.42 = 1.00; 0.42 to 0.56 = 1.85; 0.57 to 0.71 = 2.25; greater than 0.71 = 5.85). At other sites of upper body obesity, such as the biceps and triceps, skinfolds were significantly greater in patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Although obese women are at slightly higher risk for developing breast cancer, women with android obesity are a segment of obese women who appear to be at a significantly higher risk for developing breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Splanchnic insulin metabolism in obesity. Influence of body fat distribution.
Peiris, A. N., Mueller, R. A., Smith, G. A., Struve, M. F., & Kissebah, A. H. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112758 · Cited by 346
Cited by
Height, Leg Length, and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review
Gunnell, D., Okasha, M., Davey Smith, G., Oliver, S. E., Sandhu, J., & Holly, J. M. P. (2001) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a000809 · Cited by 403
Nutrition, hormones, and breast cancer: Is insulin the missing link?
Kaaks, R. (1996) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051703 · Cited by 360
Is obesity an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis?
Nair, S., Mason, A., Eason, J., Loss, G., & Perrillo, R. P. (2002) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.33713 · Cited by 348
Breast Cancer and Obesity: An Update
Stephenson, G. D., & Rose, D. P. (2003) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1207/s15327914nc4501_1 · Cited by 258
Marti, B., Tuomilehto, J., Salomaa, V, Kartovaara, L., Korhonen, H. J., & Pietinen, P. (1991) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.45.2.131 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Schapira, D. V., Kumar, N. B., Lyman, G. H., & Cox, C. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1990-02-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 182-186
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1984869877
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abdominal Obesity and Breast Cancer Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-112-3-182
- The paper
- Schapira, D. V., Kumar, N. B., Lyman, G. H., & Cox, C. E. (1990). Abdominal Obesity and Breast Cancer Risk. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-112-3-182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.