Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Practice Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion

·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

The following clinical guideline is based on the background paper "Prudent Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion," published in this issue of Annals. The goal of presenting the guideline in this format is to enhance clarity and promote use in daily clinical practice. The information provided in the various exhibits and algorithms can be found in the background paper (the numbers in brackets correspond to specific paragraphs of the background paper). The clinical guideline is structured in the following way: First, general therapeutic principles are introduced in a concise manner. Then, more specific guidelines are given in various exhibits, and a general management strategy is outlined in algorithm form. The background paper is the analytic component of the guideline, and as such it contains information that is not presented in the clinical guideline. These two documents should thus be viewed as complementing each other. Readers are invited to comment on this new format for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project (CEAP) clinical guidelines. Comments should be sent to the authors or to the Department of Scientific Policy, American College of Physicians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-03-01
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
403-406
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4254984483
Cited by
344
References
0
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-403
The paper
Practice Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion. (1992). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.