Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Right-sided Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users: Prognostic Features in 102 Episodes

Hecht, Susan R., Berger, Marvin·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic findings in a large group of patients with right-sided endocarditis and to determine whether any of these findings is predictive of prognosis. DESIGN: Retrospective survey of medical records to evaluate the course of hospitalization with follow-up on 6-month survival. Review of two-dimensional echocardiograms by an observer blinded to clinical information. SETTING: Large, metropolitan, voluntary hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-one intravenous drug users with clinical and bacteriologic evidence of 132 episodes of endocarditis. The presence of a right-sided valvular vegetation detected by two-dimensional echocardiography was required for entry into the study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was the most common infecting organism (82%, 108 of 132). Vegetations involved the tricuspid valve in 127 episodes, the pulmonic in 4, and both in 1; they ranged in size from 0.4 to 4.3 cm (mean, 1.5 +/- 0.7 cm). Vegetations greater than 1.0 cm were present in 106 cases (80%). Among patients with isolated native right-sided endocarditis who reached a definite end point in treatment, mortality was 7% (7 of 98). Vegetations greater than 2.0 cm were associated with a significantly higher mortality compared with vegetations of 2.0 cm or less (33% compared with 1.3%, P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, right-sided endocarditis has a favorable prognosis. Although complications and prolonged fever are common, most cases respond to medical therapy. Our findings suggest that vegetation size may be an important predictor of outcome and that vegetations greater than 2.0 cm are associated with increased mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-560

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, S. R., & Berger, M.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
560-566
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2142911311
Cited by
264
References
28
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Right-sided Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users: Prognostic Features in 102 Episodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-560
The paper
Hecht, S. R., & Berger, M. (1992). Right-sided Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users: Prognostic Features in 102 Episodes. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-560

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.