Cited by 228Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimated Benefits of Glycemic Control in Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes

Vijan, Sandeep, Hofer, Timothy P., Hayward, Rodney A.·1997·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes are not well quantified. It is therefore not clear which patients will benefit most from aggressive glycemic control. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Markov decision model. PATIENTS: Diabetic patients at a health maintenance organization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks for developing blindness and end-stage renal disease; number of patients and patient-years needed to treat to prevent complications. RESULTS: For a patient in whom diabetes developed before 50 years of age, reducing hemoglobin A1c levels from 9% to 7% results in an estimated 2.3-percentage point decrease (from 2.6% to 0.3%) in lifetime risk for blindness due to retinopathy. The same change in a patient with diabetes onset at 65 years of age would be expected to decrease the risk for blindness by 0.5 percentage points (from 0.5% to < 0.1%). However, the Markov model predicts substantially greater benefit when moving from poor to moderate glycemic control than when moving from moderate to almost-normal glycemic control. Targeting less than 20% of the patients at one health maintenance organization for intensified therapy may prevent more than 80% of the preventable patient-time spent blind. The risks for end-stage renal disease and the risk reduction provided by improved glycemic control are lower than those for blindness. CONCLUSIONS: This probability model, based on extrapolation from the experience with type 1 diabetes, suggests that patients with early onset of type 2 diabetes will accrue substantial benefit from almost-normal glycemic control. In patients with later onset, moderate glycemic control prevents most end-stage complications caused by microvascular disease. These results have important implications for informing patients and allocating health care resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vijan, S., Hofer, T. P., & Hayward, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Vijan, Sandeep
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
127
Issue
9
Pages
788-795
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2075434285
Cited by
228
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HSO 666501)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, tight glycemic control, microvascular complications, diabetic retinopathy, blindness, end-stage renal disease, HbA1c, Markov decision process, age at onset of diabetes, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review