Cited by 51Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Glycaemic separation and risk factor control in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial: an interim report

Abraira, C., Duckworth, W. C., Moritz, T.·2009·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Objective: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) will assess the effect of intensive (INT) vs improved standard (STD) glycaemic control on major cardiovascular (CV) events, treating other risk factors equally in both arms. Four‐year results of main metabolic parameters are presented. Research design and methods: VADT is a 7.5 years prospective randomized study of 1791 patients, 20 centres, of men and women of age 60.5 ± 8.7 years, diagnosed for 11.5 ± 7.5 years. Their body mass index (BMI) at baseline was 31 ± 4 kg/m 2 and mean A1C 9.4 ± 1.5% after maximum dose of oral agents or insulin treatment. Step treatment consists of glimepiride or metformin, rosiglitazone, insulin and other agents; A1C goals are 8–9% in STD and <6% in INT. Lifestyle, blood pressure and lipids are treated uniformly in both arms. Results: A1C improved in both arms. INT kept median A1C <7% all years, A1C separation is 1.5–1.7%. From year 1 to 4, mean blood pressure is <129/74 mmHg, similar throughout. Median LDL‐C was <97 mg/dl by year 1 and triglycerides 150 or less by 2 years. Triglycerides were lower in INT (12–16 mg/dl; p < 0.01). By 4 years, 88% are on lipid‐lowering agents and 93% are on antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents. BMI is higher in INT every year (0.9–1.6 kg/m 2 ; p < 0.01). Conclusion: VADT is maintaining the expected A1C in both STD and INT, and LDL‐C, triglycerides and blood pressure are at target. The trial is continuing to June 2008. It will be the first long‐term completed type 2 diabetes study of the role of glycaemia on CV disease with modern treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00933.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abraira, C., Duckworth, W. C., & Moritz, T.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Abraira, C.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-29
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
150-156
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2066941565
Cited by
51
References
29
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, HbA1c, cardiovascular risk factors, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, body mass index, rosiglitazone, metformin, glimepiride, insulin, lipid-lowering drugs, antiplatelet therapy, cardiovascular disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Veterans, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review