Cited by 52Diabetes Treatment and ManagementClinical practice guidelines implementationDiabetes Management and Research

An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus to Overcome Overtreatment

Open access
Makam, Anil N., Nguyen, Oanh K.·2017·Circulation

Abstract

Overtreatment is pervasive in medicine and leads to potential patient harms and excessive costs in health care. Although evidence-based medicine is often derided as practice by rote algorithmic medicine, the appropriate application of key evidence-based medicine principles in clinical decision making is fundamental to preventing overtreatment and promoting high-value, individualized patient-centered care. Specifically, this article discusses the importance of (1) using absolute rather than relative estimates of benefits to inform treatment decisions; (2) considering the time horizon to benefit of treatments; (3) balancing potential harms and benefits; and (4) using shared decision making by physicians to incorporate the patient’s values and preferences into treatment decisions. Here, we illustrate the application of these principles to considering the decision of whether or not to recommend intensive glycemic control to patients to minimize microvascular and cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Through this lens, this example will illustrate how an evidence-based medicine approach can be used to individualize glycemic goals and prevent overtreatment, and can serve as a template for applying evidence-based medicine to inform treatment decisions for other conditions to optimize health and individualize patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022622

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SGLT2i and GLP1ra significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia.

    “Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra) are novel classes of medications for type 2 diabetes that significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia and are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.4–11”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    In “What are the estimated benefits of intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes?”, the paper reports clinically significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality in trials of empagliflozin and liraglutide. It says the reductions were likely not mediated by intensive glycemic control, but treats that mechanism as an inference; the claim states independence as fact and extends findings from two drugs to their entire classes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SGLT2i and GLP1ra are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.

    “Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra) are novel classes of medications for type 2 diabetes that significantly reduce cardiovascular deaths independent of their effect on hyperglycemia and are widely endorsed by clinical practice guidelines.4–11”

    From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The section on estimated treatment benefits reports cardiovascular mortality reductions with empagliflozin and liraglutide, but does not say clinical practice guidelines endorse them. The Overtreatment in Type 2 Diabetes section discusses guidelines’ glycemic goals, not recommendations for these drug classes. Searches for guideline endorsement of the drugs found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makam, A. N., & Nguyen, O. K.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2017-01-10
Volume
135
Issue
2
Pages
180-195
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2570554553
Cited by
52
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001105, KL2TR001103)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24HS022418)
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG053291, K23AG052603)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
overtreatment, antihyperglycemic therapy, type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, glycemic targets, shared decision-making, benefit-harm balance, patient-centered care, high-value care, microvascular complications, cardiovascular complications
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Patient Participation, Patient-Centered Care, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review