Cited by 175Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can Inexpensive Signs Encourage the Use of Stairs? Results from a Community Intervention

Andersen, Ross E., Franckowiak, Shawn C., Snyder, Julia, Bartlett, Susan J., Fontaine, Kevin R.·1998·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Surgeon General advocates the accumulation of moderate-intensity activity throughout the day to improve health. OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness of signs to encourage use of stairs instead of escalators. DESIGN: Community intervention. SETTING: Shopping center. PARTICIPANTS: 17901 shoppers. INTERVENTION: Signs promoting the health and weight-control benefits of stair use were placed beside escalators with adjacent stairs. MEASUREMENTS: The sex, age, race, weight classification, and use of stairs were observed. RESULTS: Overall, stair use increased from 4.8% to 6.9% and 7.2% with the health and weight-control signs, respectively. Younger persons increase their stair use from 4.6% to 6.0% with the health sign and 6.1% with the weight-control sign. Older persons almost doubled their stair use from 5.1% to 8.1% with the health sign and increased use to 8.7% with the weight-control sign. Differential use of stairs was observed between ethnic groups. Among white persons, stair use increased from 5.1% to 7.5 and 7.8% with the health sign and weight-control signs. Among black persons, stair use decreased from 4.1% to 3.4% with the health sign and increased to 5.0% with the weight-control sign. At baseline, lean persons used the stairs more often than overweight persons (5.4% and 3.8%, respectively). The health sign increased stair use to 7.2% among normal-weight persons and 6.3% among overweight persons; the weight-control sign prompted stair use to increase to 6.9% among persons of normal weight and to 7.6% among overweight persons. CONCLUSIONS: Simple, inexpensive interventions can increase physical activity. Research is needed to identify effective motivators to promote activity among black persons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-129-5-199809010-00003

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, R. E., Franckowiak, S. C., Snyder, J., Bartlett, S. J., & Fontaine, K. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
363-369
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2084552708
Cited by
175
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
stair climbing, escalators, environmental cues, physical activity promotion, weight management, shopping centers, community-based intervention, overweight, older adults, racial differences, moderate physical activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Body Weight, Ethnicity, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motivation, Sex Factors, Exercise, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review