Cited by 991Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Disengagement and Incident Cognitive Decline in Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons

Bassuk, Shari S., Glass, Thomas A., Berkman, Lisa F.·1999·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social engagement, which is defined as the maintenance of many social connections and a high level of participation in social activities, has been thought to prevent cognitive decline in elderly persons. However, few longitudinal studies of this relation have been done. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: New Haven, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: 2812 noninstitutionalized elderly persons (65 years of age or older) who were interviewed in their homes in 1982, 1985, 1988, and 1994. MEASUREMENTS: A global social disengagement scale was constructed from the following indicators: presence of a spouse, monthly visual contact with three or more relatives or friends, yearly nonvisual contact with 10 or more relatives or friends, attendance at religious services, group membership, and regular social activities. Cognitive function was assessed with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Response to the questionnaire was scored as high, medium, or low. Cognitive decline was defined as a transition to a lower category. RESULTS: Compared with persons who had five or six social ties, those who had no social ties were at increased risk for incident cognitive decline after adjustment for age, initial cognitive performance, sex, ethnicity, education, income, housing type, physical disability, cardiovascular profile, sensory impairment, symptoms of depression, smoking, alcohol use, and level of physical activity. The 3-year odds ratio was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.40 to 3.58; P < 0.001), the 6-year odds ratio was 1.91 (CI, 1.14 to 3.18; P = 0.01), and the 12-year odds ratio was 2.37 (CI, 1.07 to 4.88; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Social disengagement is a risk factor for cognitive impairment among elderly persons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-131-3-199908030-00002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02021.x · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0882-7974.1.1.55 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.25 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/geronj/48.1.P1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/ageing/25.1.72 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2003 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/ageing/23.3.195 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.42.11.2063 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0033291700026945 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06093.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/BF03324123 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x · DOI
  13. 10.1177/089826439100300102 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00908.x · DOI
  15. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008801 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036092 · DOI
  17. 10.1159/000109800 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/geronj/21.4.556 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/2531734 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036065 · DOI
  22. 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002243 · DOI
  23. Eisdorfer C, 1992, Am J Psychiatry, 149, 190, 10.1176/ajp.149.2.190 · DOI
  24. 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1073 · DOI
  25. 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.951 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1212/WNL.43.1_Part_1.13 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-X · DOI · Paper page
  28. Seeman TE, 1997, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 82, 2458
  29. 10.1001/archfami.6.1.67 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90608-X · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1212/WNL.40.7.1102 · DOI
  32. 10.2105/AJPH.84.8.1214 · DOI
  33. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550160092044 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 991

Metadata

Authors
Bassuk, S. S., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1999-08-03
Volume
131
Issue
3
Pages
165-173
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2037855378
Cited by
991
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 38
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ag012102-011, n01ag002105-019, 7r01ag011042-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (N01AG02105, R01-AG-11042, N01‐AG12102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social disengagement, social engagement, cognitive decline, cognitive impairment, community-dwelling older adults, social ties, social isolation, risk factors, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Isolation, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review