Cited by 418Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Social and Leisure Activities and Risk of Dementia: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Fabrigoule, Colette, Letenneur, Luc, Dartigues, Jean François, Zarrouk, Mounir, Commenges, Daniel, Barberger‐Gateau, Pascale·1995·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between social and leisure activities and risk of subsequent dementia in older community residents. SETTING: A cohort study of people aged 65 and older were followed‐up 1 and 3 years after a baseline screening (the Paquid study). PARTICIPANTS: 2040 older subjects living at home in Gironde (France) were randomly selected and followed for at least 3 years. DATA COLLECTION: Information about social and leisure activities was collected during the baseline screening with an interview by a psychologist. Incident cases of dementia were detected during the first and third year follow‐up screenings according to the DSM‐III‐R criteria. MAIN RESULTS: All but one of the social and leisure activities noted were significantly associated with a lower risk of dementia. Only golden club participation was not significantly associated with this risk. After adjustment for age and cognitive performance measured by the Mini‐Mental State Exam, visual memory test, and verbal fluency test, only traveling (Relative risk (RR) = .48, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) = .24‐.94), odd jobs or knitting (RR = .46, 95%CI = .26‐.85), and gardening (RR = .53, 95%CI = .28‐.99) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Regular participation in social or leisure activities such as traveling, odds jobs, knitting, or gardening were associated with a lower risk of subsequent dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06093.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabrigoule, C., Letenneur, L., Dartigues, J. F., Zarrouk, M., Commenges, D., & Barberger‐Gateau, P.
Affiliations
Université de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Fabrigoule, Colette
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-05
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
485-490
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2057631986
Cited by
418
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
dementia risk, social activity, leisure, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, gardening, knitting, odd jobs, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Leisure Activities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review