Cited by 210Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNosocomial Infections in ICUOcular Infections and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empirical Fluconazole versus Placebo for Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive infection with Candida species is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Optimal preventive strategies have not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To see whether empirical fluconazole improves clinical outcomes more than placebo in adult ICU patients at high risk for invasive candidiasis. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted from 1995 to 2000. SETTING: 26 ICUs in the United States. PATIENTS: 270 adult ICU patients with fever despite administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. All had central venous catheters and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score greater than 16. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to either intravenous fluconazole, 800 mg daily, or placebo for 2 weeks and were followed for 4 weeks thereafter. Two hundred forty-nine participants were available for outcome assessment. MEASUREMENTS: A composite primary outcome that defined success as all 4 of the following: resolution of fever; absence of invasive fungal infection; no discontinuation because of toxicity; and no need for a nonstudy, systemic antifungal medication (as assessed by a blinded oversight committee). RESULTS: Only 44 of 122 (36%) fluconazole recipients and 48 of 127 (38%) placebo recipients had a successful outcome (relative risk, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.32; P = 0.78]). The main reason for failure was lack of resolution of fever (51% for fluconazole and 57% for placebo). Documented invasive candidiasis occurred in 5% of fluconazole recipients and 9% of placebo recipients (relative risk, 0.57 [CI, 0.22 to 1.49]). Seven (5%) fluconazole recipients and 10 (7%) placebo recipients had adverse events resulting in discontinuation of the study drug. Discontinuation because of abnormal liver test results occurred in 3 (2%) fluconazole recipients and 5 (4%) placebo recipients. LIMITATIONS: Twenty-one randomly assigned patients were not included in the analysis because they either did not meet entry criteria or did not have postbaseline assessments. Fewer fungal infections than anticipated occurred in the control group. Confidence bounds were wide and did not exclude potentially important differences in outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: In critically ill adults with risk factors for invasive candidiasis, empirical fluconazole did not clearly improve a composite outcome more than placebo.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1001/jama.1995.03530080055041 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Schuster, M. G., Edwards, J. E., Sobel, J. D., Darouiche, R. O., Karchmer, A. W., Hadley, S., Slotman, G., Panzer, H., Biswas, P., & Rex, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
149
Issue
2
Pages
83-90
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2041927838
Cited by
210
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
invasive candidiasis, fluconazole, intensive care unit patients, critically ill adults, central venous catheters, APACHE II score, antifungal toxicity, liver function tests, composite endpoints, treatment discontinuation, ICU length of stay, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Critical Care, Cross Infection, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Fluconazole, Fungemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review