The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer Mentoring and Financial Incentives to Improve Glucose Control in African American Veterans: A Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Compared with white persons, African Americans have a greater incidence of diabetes, decreased control, and higher rates of microvascular complications. A peer mentorship model could be a scalable approach to improving control in this population and reducing disparities in diabetic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether peer mentors or financial incentives are superior to usual care in helping African American veterans decrease their hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels. DESIGN: A 6-month randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01125956) SETTING: Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: African American veterans aged 50 to 70 years with persistently poor diabetes control. INTERVENTION: 118 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: usual care, a peer mentoring group, and a financial incentives group. Usual care patients were notified of their starting HbA(1c) level and recommended goals for HbA(1c). Those in the peer mentoring group were assigned a mentor who formerly had poor glycemic control but now had good control (HbA(1c) level ≤7.5%). The mentor was asked to talk with the patient at least once per week. Peer mentors were matched by race, sex, and age. Patients in the financial incentive group could earn $100 by decreasing their HbA(1c) level by 1% and $200 by decreasing it by 2% or to an HbA(1c) level of 6.5%. MEASUREMENTS: Change in HbA(1c) level at 6 months. RESULTS: Mentors and mentees talked the most in the first month (mean calls, 4; range, 0 to 30), but calls decreased to a mean of 2 calls (range, 0 to 10) by the sixth month. Levels of HbA(1c) decreased from 9.9% to 9.8% in the control group, from 9.8% to 8.7% in the peer mentor group, and from 9.5% to 9.1% in the financial incentive group. Mean change in HbA(1c) level from baseline to 6 months relative to control was -1.07% (95% CI, -1.84% to -0.31%) in the peer mentor group and -0.45% (CI, -1.23% to 0.32%) in the financial incentive group. LIMITATION: The study included only veterans and lasted only 6 months. CONCLUSION: Peer mentorship improved glucose control in a cohort of African American veterans with diabetes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging Roybal Center.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, there is growing evidence for the role of community health workers (71,72), as well as peer (71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76) and lay leaders (77), in providing ongoing support.”
From 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes:Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Heisler, M. (2009) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp003 · Cited by 187
RetractedMultiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0802743 · Cited by 7,888
Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes
Duckworth, W., Abraira, C., Moritz, T., Reda, D., Emanuele, N., Reaven, P. D., Zieve, F. J., Marks, J., Davis, S. N., Hayward, R., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0808431 · Cited by 4,762
O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.103 · Cited by 3,055
Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values.
Donders, A. R. T., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., Stijnen, T., & Moons, K. G. M. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014 · Cited by 2,582
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Lau, J., Smith, S. J., Schmid, C. H., & Engelgau, M. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 · Cited by 1,750
What is Motivational Interviewing?
Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s135246580001643x · Cited by 1,737
Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003) · The University of Chicago Law Review · doi:10.2307/1600573 · Cited by 1,340
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Pleis JR, 2009, Vital Health Stat 10, 1
- Shacter HE, 2009, Ethn Dis, 19, 121
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s014 · Cited by 4,572
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013
American Diabetes Association (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-s011 · Cited by 4,369
5. Lifestyle Management:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019
American Diabetes Association (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc19-s005 · Cited by 700
4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018
American Diabetes Association (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-s004 · Cited by 563
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s005 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, J. A., Jahnle, E. C., Richardson, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Volpp, K. G.
- Affiliations
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2012-03-20
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 416-424
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- PMC
- PMC3475415
- OpenAlex
- W2115695512
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG034546)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- peer mentoring, financial incentives, glycemic control, HbA1c, type 2 diabetes, African American veterans, diabetes disparities, peer mentors, diabetes self-management, behavioral interventions, Veterans Affairs health care, microvascular complications
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Black or African American, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Mentors, Middle Aged, Reward, Social Support, Telephone, Veterans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review