Cited by 442Nutrition and Health StudiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressNutritional Studies and Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vitamin and Mineral Supplements in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Fortmann, Stephen P., Burda, Brittany U., Senger, Caitlyn A., Lin, Jennifer S., Whitlock, Evelyn P.·2013·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vitamin and mineral supplements are commonly used to prevent chronic diseases. PURPOSE: To systematically review evidence for the benefit and harms of vitamin and mineral supplements in community-dwelling, nutrient-sufficient adults for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched from January 2005 to 29 January 2013, with manual searches of reference lists and gray literature. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently selected and reviewed fair- and good-quality trials for benefit and fair- and good-quality trials and observational studies for harms. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual quality assessments and data abstraction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two large trials (n = 27 658) reported lower cancer incidence in men taking a multivitamin for more than 10 years (pooled unadjusted relative risk, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99]). The study that included women showed no effect in that group. High-quality studies (k = 24; n = 324 653) of single and paired nutrients (such as vitamins A, C, or D; folic acid; selenium; or calcium) were scant and heterogeneous and showed no clear evidence of benefit or harm. Neither vitamin E nor β-carotene prevented CVD or cancer, and β-carotene increased lung cancer risk in smokers. LIMITATIONS: The analysis included only primary prevention studies in adults without known nutritional deficiencies. Studies were conducted in older individuals and included various supplements and doses under the set upper tolerable limits. Duration of most studies was less than 10 years. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence supports any benefit from vitamin and mineral supplementation for the prevention of cancer or CVD. Two trials found a small, borderline-significant benefit from multivitamin supplements on cancer in men only and no effect on CVD. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00729

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Gahche J, 2011, NCHS Data Brief, 1
  2. Huang HY, 2006, Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), 1
  3. 10.1001/jama.1996.03540240035027 · DOI
  4. Moon TE, 1997, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 6, 949
  5. Levine N, 1997, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 6, 957
  6. Hercberg S, 1998, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 68, 3
  7. Bjelakovic G, 2008, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004183
  8. Bjelakovic G, 2008, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD007176
  9. Rees K, 2013, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, CD009671
  10. Alkhenizan A, 2007, Ann Saudi Med, 27, 409
  11. Ford JA, 2012, Circulation, 126, A18397
  12. Duffield-Lillico AJ, 2002, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 11, 630

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 442

Metadata

Authors
Fortmann, S. P., Burda, B. U., Senger, C. A., Lin, J. S., & Whitlock, E. P.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2013-12
Volume
159
Issue
12
Pages
824-834
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2168613688
Cited by
442
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (HHS-290-2007-10057-I)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, multivitamins, cardiovascular disease prevention, cancer prevention, primary prevention, vitamin E, beta-carotene, selenium, calcium, folic acid, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin D
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Minerals, Neoplasms, Primary Prevention, Vitamins, Incidence, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review