Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vitamin C and the Common Cold.

·1972·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Huge doses of vitamin C, from one to ten grams daily, are recommended by some scientists as a treatment for and preventative against the common cold. But the prolonged use of such large doses may be dangerous, because there is evidence that breakdown products of vitamin C formed in the body (for instance, oxalic acid) are a threat to health. Also large doses of the vitamin can enhance the dangerous effects of certain toxic substances in food. It would obviously be both easier and safer for the public to take vitamin C in the smaller quantities in which it is found in certain foodstuffs. Citrus fruits, such as oranges and lemons and also blackcurrants, are particularly rich in vitamin C, the average orange containing about 30mg.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-76-2-352_9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1972-02-01
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
352-352
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1960334954
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
18.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vitamin C and the Common Cold. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-76-2-352_9
The paper
Vitamin C and the Common Cold. (1972). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-76-2-352_9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.