Cited by 247Antibiotic Use and ResistancePneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Excess Antibiotic Treatment Duration and Adverse Events in Patients Hospitalized With Pneumonia: A Multihospital Cohort Study

Open access
Vaughn, Valerie M., Flanders, Scott A., Snyder, Ashley, Conlon, Anna, Rogers, Mary A.M., Malani, Anurag N., McLaughlin, Elizabeth, Bloemers, Sarah +8 more·2019·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials demonstrate no benefit from antibiotic treatment exceeding the shortest effective duration. Objective: To examine predictors and outcomes associated with excess duration of antibiotic treatment. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: 43 hospitals in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium. Patients: 6481 general care medical patients with pneumonia. Measurements: The primary outcome was the rate of excess antibiotic treatment duration (excess days per 30-day period). Excess days were calculated by subtracting each patient's shortest effective (expected) treatment duration (based on time to clinical stability, pathogen, and pneumonia classification [community-acquired vs. health care-associated]) from the actual duration. Negative binomial generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to calculate rate ratios to assess predictors of 30-day rates of excess duration. Patient outcomes, assessed at 30 days via the medical record and telephone calls, were evaluated using logit GEEs that adjusted for patient characteristics and probability of treatment. Results: Two thirds (67.8% [4391 of 6481]) of patients received excess antibiotic therapy. Antibiotics prescribed at discharge accounted for 93.2% of excess duration. Patients who had respiratory cultures or nonculture diagnostic testing, had a longer stay, received a high-risk antibiotic in the prior 90 days, had community-acquired pneumonia, or did not have a total antibiotic treatment duration documented at discharge were more likely to receive excess treatment. Excess treatment was not associated with lower rates of any adverse outcomes, including death, readmission, emergency department visit, or Clostridioides difficile infection. Each excess day of treatment was associated with a 5% increase in the odds of antibiotic-associated adverse events reported by patients after discharge. Limitation: Retrospective design; not all patients could be contacted to report 30-day outcomes. Conclusion: Patients hospitalized with pneumonia often receive excess antibiotic therapy. Excess antibiotic treatment was associated with patient-reported adverse events. Future interventions should focus on whether reducing excess treatment and improving documentation at discharge improves outcomes. Primary Funding Source: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) and Blue Care Network as part of the BCBSM Value Partnerships program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m18-3640

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Rubin DB. Multiple imputations in sample surveys – a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods section of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 1978: 20– 34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, V. M., Flanders, S. A., Snyder, A., Conlon, A., Rogers, M. A. M., Malani, A. N., McLaughlin, E., Bloemers, S., Srinivasan, A., Nagel, J., Kaatz, S., Osterholzer, D., Thyagarajan, R., Hsaiky, L., Chopra, V., & Gandhi, T. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Trinity Health Michigan (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Hurley Medical Center (US)
  • Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
171
Issue
3
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2956950695
Cited by
247
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 11
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
pneumonia, antibiotic stewardship, community-acquired pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, hospital discharge documentation, length of hospital stay, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Duration of Therapy, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Community-Acquired Infections, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Inappropriate Prescribing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review