Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and Psychology

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the experiencing of self scale (EOSS) for assessment in functional analytic psychotherapy

Open access
Valero-Aguayo, Luis, Ferro-García, Rafael, López-Bermúdez, Miguel, Selva-López de Huralde, María·2014·Psicothema

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Experiencing of Self Scale (EOSS) was created to evaluate the experience of the personal self, within the field of Functional Analytic Psychotherapy. This paper presents a study of the reliability and validity of the EOSS in a Spanish sample. METHOD: The study sample, chosen from 24 different centres, comprised 1,040 participants aged between 18-75, of whom 32% were men and 68% women. The clinical sample was made up of 32.7%, whereas 67.3% had no known problem. To obtain evidence of convergent validity, other questionnaires related to the self (EPQ-R, DES, RSES) were used for comparison. RESULTS: The EOSS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .941) and significantly high correlations with the EPQ-R Neuroticism scale and the DES Dissociation scale, while showing negative correlations with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). The EOSS revealed 4 principal factors: a self in close relationships, a self with casual social relationships, a self in general and a positive self-concept. Significant statistical differences were found between the clinical and standard sample, the former showing a higher average. CONCLUSIONS: The EOSS had high internal consistency, showing evidence of convergent validity with similar scales and proving useful for the assessment of people with psychological problems related to the self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2014.15

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valero-Aguayo, L., Ferro-García, R., López-Bermúdez, M., & Selva-López de Huralde, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Málaga
  • Centro de Psicología Clínica CEDI de Granada
  • Centro de Psicología CEPSI de Bailén (Jaén)
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
26
Pages
415-422
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2123908987
Cited by
11
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
Spanish translation, functional analytic psychotherapy, self-concept, self-esteem, dissociation, neuroticism, psychometric properties, convergent validity, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Translations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review