The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Las alfareras rebeldes: una mirada desde la arqueología ecuatoriana a las relaciones de género, la opresión femenina y el patriarcado
Abstract
Objective/context: In the light of Engels’ proposal on the origin and consolidation of patriarchy, this article proposes a re-reading of some iconographic elements of the period of Regional Development of the coast of Ecuador. The anthropomorphic figurines of the Tolita/Tumaco, Bahia, and Jama Coaque cultures, famous for their aesthetic value, present evidence of asymmetrical gender relations that have so far not been observed or thematized in literature. Methodology: The article is based on the iconographic analysis that the author has been conducting for over a decade. The iconography is contrasted with Engels’ theory from a feminist approach. It includes a reflection on different historical and contemporary episodes that reveal a patriarchal and machista system prevailing in Ecuador, about which the author also presents an introspective vision from her own experience as an academic. Conclusions: The early iconography of the Ecuadorian coast shows a substantial change between the Formative and Regional Development periods. The increase in social stratification and the accumulation of wealth probably led to the establishment of a patriarchal ideology, justified through iconography as a means of mass transmission of messages. Originality: This article provides in-depth coverage, for the first time, of the discussion on inequality in gender relations in pre-Hispanic Ecuador and material evidence of an ideological discourse tending to naturalize such inequality, through an ideal of subordination of female characters to male ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite these limitations, the evidence suggest that the figurines are complex and organized symbolic representations, which show some consistency in their morphological features [9, 21, 22].”
From Reverse engineering of ceramic anthropomorphic figurines from the tumaco archaeological tradition in southwest Colombia (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Benavides, Hugo. 2017. “Transgéneros en la costa ecuatoriana: una historia del presente evanescente”. En Trans. Diversidad de identidades y roles de género, coordinado por Andrés GutiérrezUsillos, 119-124. Madrid: Museo de América.
- Brumfiel, Elizabeth. 1991. “Weaving and Cooking: Women’s Production in Aztec Mexico”. En Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, editado por JoanGero y MargaretConkey, 224-251. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble.Nueva York: Routledge.
- Conkey, Margaret. 2003. “Has Feminism Changed Archaeology?” Signs 28 (3): 867-880. · DOI
- Conkey, Margaret y JanetSpector. 1984. “Archaeology and the Study of Gender”. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 1-38. · DOI · Paper page
- Ette, Ottmar. 2004. “… que uno lamenta, cómo ha dejado de ser alemán: Alexander von Humboldt, Prusia y América”. En Literatura-historia-política. Articulando las relaciones entre Europa y América Latina, editado por GüntherMaihold y SonjaSteckbauer, 73-98. Berlín: Iberoamericana-Vervuert. https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954879854-006 · DOI
- Gero, Joan. 1985. “Socio-Politics and the Woman-at-Home Ideology”. American Antiquity 50 (2): 342-350. · DOI
- Gero, Joan M. y CristinaScattolin. 2002. “Beyond Complementarity and Hierarchy: New Definitions for Archaeological Gender Relations”. En In Pursuit of Gender: Worldwide Archaeological Approaches, editado por Sarah MilledgeNelson y MyriamRosen-Ayalon, 155-171. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press. · DOI
- Hastorf, Christine A. 1991. “Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory”. En Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, editado por Joan M.Gero y Margaret W.Conkey, 132-163. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Lugones, María. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism”. Hypatia 25 (4): 742-759. · DOI
- Pearson, Marylis y Paul R.Mullins. 1999. “Domesticating Barbie: An Archaeology of Barbie Material Culture and Domestic Ideology” International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3 (4): 225-259. · DOI
- Scattolin, María Cristina. 2003. “Representaciones sexuadas y jerarquías sociales en el noroeste argentino prehispánico”. Acta Americana 11 (1): 30-48.
- Slocum, Sally. 1975. “Woman the Gatherer: Male Bias in Anthropology”. En Toward an Anthropology of Women, editado por RaynaReiter, 36-50. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
- Ugalde, María Fernanda. 2017. “De siamesas y matrimonios: tras la simbología del género y la identidad sexual en la iconografía de las culturas precolombinas de la costa ecuatoriana” En Trans. Diversidad de identidades y roles de género, coordinado por Andres GutiérrezUsillos, 108-118. Madrid: Museo de América. https://es.calameo.com/read/00007533558e07eb92b6d
- Ugalde, María Fernanda. 2011. “La imagen como medio de comunicación en el Desarrollo Regional. Interpretación de un motivo de la iconografía Tolita”. En Revista Nacional de Cultura. Letras, Artes y Ciencias del Ecuador 3 (15-16): 565-576.
- Ugalde, María Fernanda y HugoBenavides. 2018. “Queer Histories and Identities on the Ecuadorian Coast”. Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies 1 (1): 157-182. https://doi.org/10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v1i1.3 · DOI
- Weismantel, Mary. 2013. “Towards a Transgender Archaeology: A Queer Rampage through Prehistory”. En: The Transgender Studies Reader, vol. 2, editado por SusanStryker y Aren Z.Aizura, 319-334. Nueva York: Routledge.
- Wittig, Monique. 1993. “One Is not Born a Woman”. En The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, editado por HenryAbelove, Michéle AinaBarale y David M.Halperin, 103-109. Nueva York: Routledge.
- Wylie, Alison. 2007. “Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14 (3): 209-216. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bustamante, N. A., Escobar, J. A., & Martinón-Torres, M. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250230 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ugalde, M. F.
- Venue
- Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología
- Publisher
- Universidad de los Andes
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 33-56
- ISSN
- 2011-4273
- 1900-5407
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review