Cited by 372HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role and outcomes of community health workers in HIV care in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review

Open access
Mwai, Grace W, Mburu, Gitau, Torpey, Kwasi, Frost, Peter, Ford, Nathan, Seeley, Janet·2013·Journal of the International AIDS Society

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The provision of HIV treatment and care in sub-Saharan Africa faces multiple challenges, including weak health systems and attrition of trained health workers. One potential response to overcome these challenges has been to engage community health workers (CHWs). METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search for quantitative and qualitative studies describing the role and outcomes of CHWs in HIV care between inception and December 2012 in sub-Saharan Africa was performed in the following databases: PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science, JSTOR, WHOLIS, Google Scholar and SAGE journals online. Bibliographies of included articles were also searched. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyze common emerging themes on the role and outcomes of CHWs in HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, documenting a range of tasks performed by CHWs. These included patient support (counselling, home-based care, education, adherence support and livelihood support) and health service support (screening, referral and health service organization and surveillance). CHWs were reported to enhance the reach, uptake and quality of HIV services, as well as the dignity, quality of life and retention in care of people living with HIV. The presence of CHWs in clinics was reported to reduce waiting times, streamline patient flow and reduce the workload of health workers. Clinical outcomes appeared not to be compromised, with no differences in virologic failure and mortality comparing patients under community-based and those under facility-based care. Despite these benefits, CHWs faced challenges related to lack of recognition, remuneration and involvement in decision making. CONCLUSIONS: CHWs can clearly contribute to HIV services delivery and strengthen human resource capacity in sub-Saharan Africa. For their contribution to be sustained, CHWs need to be recognized, remunerated and integrated in wider health systems. Further research focusing on comparative costs of CHW interventions and successful models for mainstreaming CHWs into wider health systems is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7448/ias.16.1.18586

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic representation of study selection.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of study selection.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. UNAIDS, 2012, Report on the global AIDS epidemic
  2. Silverman D, 2001, Methods for analyzing talk text and interaction
  3. World Health Organization, 1989, Strengthening the performance of community health workers in primary health care
  4. World Health Organization, 2010, Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related millennium development goals: a systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Mwai, G. W., Mburu, G., Torpey, K., Frost, P., Ford, N., & Seeley, J.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • International HIV/AIDS Alliance (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Mwai, Grace W
Venue
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
18586-18586
ISSN
1758-2652 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100664910
Cited by
372
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International AIDS Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
community health workers, HIV care, sub-Saharan Africa, patient support, home care, retention in care, health workforce capacity, community-based care
MeSH terms
Africa, Community Health Workers, Health Services Research, Humans, HIV Infections, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review