The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the incidence and mortality of female breast cancer for countries in the Asia-Pacific region. METHODS: Statistical information about breast cancer was obtained from publicly available cancer registry and mortality databases (such as GLOBOCAN), and supplemented with data requested from individual cancer registries. Rates were directly age-standardised to the Segi World Standard population and trends were analysed using joinpoint models. RESULTS: Breast cancer was the most common type of cancer among females in the region, accounting for 18% of all cases in 2012, and was the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths (9%). Although incidence rates remain much higher in New Zealand and Australia, rapid rises in recent years were observed in several Asian countries. Large increases in breast cancer mortality rates also occurred in many areas, particularly Malaysia and Thailand, in contrast to stabilising trends in Hong Kong and Singapore, while decreases have been recorded in Australia and New Zealand. Mortality trends tended to be more favourable for women aged under 50 compared to those who were 50 years or older. CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that incidence rates of breast cancer in developing countries throughout the Asia-Pacific region will continue to increase. Early detection and access to optimal treatment are the keys to reducing breast cancer-related mortality, but cultural and economic obstacles persist. Consequently, the challenge is to customise breast cancer control initiatives to the particular needs of each country to ensure the best possible outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations
Boyle, P. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds187 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Global cancer in women: burden and trends.
Torre, L. A., Islami, F., Siegel, R. L., Ward, E. M., & Jemal, A. (2017) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0858 · Cited by 1,245
Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world
Momenimovahed, Z., & Salehiniya, H. (2019) · Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s176070 · Cited by 1,050
Tripathy, D., Im, S.-A., Colleoni, M., Franke, F., Bardia, A., Harbeck, N., Hurvitz, S. A., Chow, L., Sohn, J., Lee, K. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30292-4 · Cited by 1,025
International Variation in Female Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates
DeSantis, C. E., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Anderson, B. O., & Jemal, A. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0535 · Cited by 804
Ohuchi, N., Suzuki, A., Sobue, T., Kawai, M., Yamamoto, S., Zheng, Y.-F., Shiono, Y. N., Saito, H., Kuriyama, S., Tohno, E., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00774-6 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Youlden, D. R., Cramb, S. M., Yip, C. H., & Baade, P. D.
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-15
- OpenAlex
- W1503137832
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.02.005
- The paper
- Youlden, D. R., Cramb, S. M., Yip, C. H., & Baade, P. D. (2014). Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.02.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.