The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information
Abstract
An argument that the material arrangements of information—how it is represented and interpreted—matter significantly for our experience of information and information systems. Virtual entities that populate our digital experience, like e-books, virtual worlds, and online stores, are backed by the large-scale physical infrastructures of server farms, fiber optic cables, power plants, and microwave links. But another domain of material constraints also shapes digital living: the digital representations sketched on whiteboards, encoded into software, stored in databases, loaded into computer memory, and transmitted on networks. These digital representations encode aspects of our everyday world and make them available for digital processing. The limits and capacities of those representations carry significant consequences for digital society. In The Stuff of Bits, Paul Dourish examines the specific materialities that certain digital objects exhibit. He presents four case studies: emulation, the creation of a “virtual” computer inside another; digital spreadsheets and their role in organizational practice; relational databases and the issue of “the databaseable”; and the evolution of digital networking and the representational entailments of network protocols. These case studies demonstrate how a materialist account can offer an entry point to broader concerns—questions of power, policy, and polity in the realm of the digital.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nostr and Farcaster embed a politics of sovereignty, privileging user control even at the expense of relative ease of use [36].”
From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davis, J. L. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11967.001.0001 · Cited by 516
Wakkary, R. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13649.001.0001 · Cited by 460
Dosono, B., & Semaan, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300372 · Cited by 178
The Cloud Is Material: On the Environmental Impacts of Computation and Data Storage
Monserrate, S. G. (2022) · MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing · doi:10.21428/2c646de5.031d4553 · Cited by 145
Soden, R., & Palen, L. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274431 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Dourish, P.
- Corresponding author
- Dourish, Paul
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2017-04-28
- OpenAlex
- W4230940151
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
- Keywords
- materiality of information, digital representation, information systems, emulation, virtual machines, relational databases, network protocols, digital networking, materialist theory, digital society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review