Cited by 208Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeural dynamics and brain function

The Feeling of Life Itself: Why Consciousness Is Widespread but Can't Be Computed

Koch, Christof·2019·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

A thought-provoking argument that consciousness—more widespread than previously assumed—is the feeling of being alive, not a type of computation or a clever hack. In The Feeling of Life Itself, Christof Koch offers a straightforward definition of consciousness as any subjective experience, from the most mundane to the most exalted—the feeling of being alive. Psychologists study which cognitive operations underpin a given conscious perception. Neuroscientists track the neural correlates of consciousness in the brain, the organ of the mind. But why the brain and not, say, the liver? How can the brain—three pounds of highly excitable matter, a piece of furniture in the universe, subject to the same laws of physics as any other piece—give rise to subjective experience? Koch argues that what is needed to answer these questions is a quantitative theory that starts with experience and proceeds to the brain. In The Feeling of Life Itself, Koch outlines such a theory, based on integrated information. Koch describes how the theory explains many facts about the neurology of consciousness and how it has been used to build a clinically useful consciousness meter. The theory predicts that many, and perhaps all, animals experience the sights and sounds of life; consciousness is much more widespread than conventionally assumed. Contrary to received wisdom, however, Koch argues that programmable computers will not have consciousness. Even a perfect software model of the brain is not conscious. Its simulation is fake consciousness. Consciousness is not a special type of computation—it is not a clever hack. Consciousness is about being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/11705.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within IIT, a Turing machine may have wildly different predicted contents of consciousness for the same behavior or reports.

    “within IIT it has already been acknowledged that a Turing machine may have a wildly different predicted contents of consciousness for the same behavior or reports (Koch 2019).”

    From Falsification and consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Koch 2019

  • Lesion studies show that areas of the PFC can be removed with little apparent change in conscious experience to the patient, whereas lesions in primary motor or sensory areas cause striking differences in content-specific perceptual experience.

    “Consistent with Penfield's findings, lesion studies from a century of neurosurgery research show that areas of the PFC can be removed with little apparent change in conscious experience to the patient, whereas lesions in primary motor or sensory areas (often referred to as eloquent cortex) cause striking differences in content-specific perceptual experience (Henri- Bhargava et al., 2018; Koch, 201”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koch, C.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2019-09-24
OpenAlex
W4239432553
Cited by
208
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
FWCI
13.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
consciousness, integrated information theory, subjective experience, neural correlates of consciousness, animal consciousness, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review