Cited by 2Free Will and AgencyPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Hot or not

Koch, Christof·2020·Nature Human Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-020-0925-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low rates of iES effects are not unique to prefrontal regions, but appear to be a more general property of brain areas involved in abstract thought and complex cognitive function, although the lowest elicitation rates are nonetheless found in the anterior PFC.

    “Low rates of iES effects are not unique to prefrontal regions, but appear to be a more general property of brain areas involved in abstract thought and complex cognitive function, although the lowest elicitation rates are nonetheless found in the anterior PFC (Fox et al., 2020;Koch, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Koch, C.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2020-07-20
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
991-992
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042486488
Cited by
2
References
10
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
brain surgery, conscious perception, sensory input, motor output, consciousness, cortical regions
MeSH terms
Brain, Electric Stimulation, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review