The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nudge Nudge Wink Wink: Elements of Face-to-Face Conversation for Embodied Conversational Agents
Abstract
Introduction Only humans communicate using language and carry on conversations with one another. And the skills of conversation have developed in humans in such a way as to exploit all of the unique affordances of the human body. We make complex representational gestures with our prehensile hands, gaze away and towards one another out of the corners of our centrally set eyes, and use the pitch and melody of our voices to emphasize and clarify what we are saying. Perhaps because conversation is so defining of humanness and human interaction, the metaphor of face-to-face conversation has been applied to human-computer interface design for quite some time. One of the early arguments for the utility of this metaphor gave a list of features of face-to-face conversation that could be applied fruitfully to human-computer interaction, including mixed initiative, nonverbal communication, sense of presence, rules for transfer of control (Nickerson 1976). However, although these feature
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
Gestures specialized for dialogue
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295214010 · Cited by 272
Interaction and feedback in a spoken language system: a theoretical framework
Brennan, S. E., & Hulteen, E. A. (1995) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/0950-7051(95)98376-h · Cited by 148
Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality
Takeuchi, A., & Nagao, K. (1993) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/169059.169156 · Cited by 140
Cited by
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162
Emotion and sociable humanoid robots
Breazeal, C. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00018-1 · Cited by 1,279
BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit
Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., & Bickmore, T. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383315 · Cited by 739
Self-citationExplorations in engagement for humans and robots
Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Kidd, C. D., Lesh, N., & Rich, C. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.005 · Cited by 558
Embodied conversational interface agents
Cassell, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332075 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cassell, J.
- Venue
- Embodied Conversational Agents
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2000-03-27
- Pages
- 1-27
- OpenAlex
- W1581889689
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.45
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nudge Nudge Wink Wink: Elements of Face-to-Face Conversation for Embodied Conversational Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/2697.003.0002
- The paper
- Cassell, J. (2000). Nudge Nudge Wink Wink: Elements of Face-to-Face Conversation for Embodied Conversational Agents. Embodied Conversational Agents. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2697.003.0002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
