The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up
Abstract
How do social structures and group behaviors arise from the interaction of individuals? Growing Artificial Societies approaches this question with cutting-edge computer simulation techniques. Fundamental collective behaviors such as group formation, cultural transmission, combat, and trade are seen to "emerge" from the interaction of individual agents following a few simple rules. In their program, named Sugarscape, Epstein and Axtell begin the development of a "bottom up" social science that is capturing the attention of researchers and commentators alike. The study is part of the 2050 Project, a joint venture of the Santa Fe Institute, the World Resources Institute, and the Brookings Institution. The project is an international effort to identify conditions for a sustainable global system in the next century and to design policies to help achieve such a system. Copublished with the Brookings Institution Bradford Books imprint
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Complex systems scientists have explored emergent behavior and phase transitions, but not in the context of adversarial AI interactions.
“Complex systems scientists have explored emergent behavior (Kauffman, 1993;Epstein & Axtell, 1996), and phase transitions (Langton, 1990b), but not in the context of adversarial AI interactions.”
From Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Epstein & Axtell, 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems
Bonabeau, E. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082080899 · Cited by 4,500
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001975 · Cited by 2,031
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review
Bousquet, F., & Le Page, C. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011 · Cited by 736
Big data for development: a review of promises and challenges
Hilbert, M. (2016) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12142 · Cited by 679
Can Generative AI improve social science?
Bail, C. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314021121 · Cited by 369
Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation
Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., & Holman, B. (2017) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/688938 · Cited by 216
Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers
Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00084-7 · Cited by 211
On-Orbit Servicing: A New Value Proposition for Satellite Design and Operation
Long, A. M., Richards, M. G., & Hastings, D. E. (2007) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/1.27117 · Cited by 158
CAN HOT SPOTS POLICING REDUCE CRIME IN URBAN AREAS? AN AGENT‐BASED SIMULATION*
WEISBURD, D., BRAGA, A. A., GROFF, E. R., & WOODITCH, A. (2017) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12131 · Cited by 140
The burden of social proof: Shared thresholds and social influence
MacCoun, R. J. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0027121 · Cited by 84
Agentic Large Language Models, a Survey
Plaat, A., Van Duijn, M., Van Stein, N., Preuss, M., Van der Putten, P., & Batenburg, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.18675 · Cited by 75
Brunswicker, S., Almirall, E., & Majchrzak, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13561 · Cited by 59
Piao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5954414 · Cited by 43
Piao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43
Extending drug ethno-epidemiology using agent-based modelling
Moore, D., Dray, A., Green, R., Hudson, S. L., Jenkinson, R., Siokou, C., Perez, P., Bammer, G., Maher, L., & Dietze, P. (2009) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02709.x · Cited by 36
An Agent-Based Approach to Providing Tourism Planning Support
Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b35148 · Cited by 35
The Effects of Developer Dynamics on Fitness in an Evolutionary Ecosystem Model of the App Store
Lim, S. L., Bentley, P. J., & Ishikawa, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2015.2494382 · Cited by 13
Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground
Poutanen, P., Siira, K., & Aula, P. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316639713 · Cited by 10
Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents
de Witt, C. S., Krawiecka, K., Krawczuk, I., Hagag, B., Anderson, W. L., Belcak, P., Bucknall, B., Cai, X., Chopra, A., Cohen, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.02077 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L.
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1996-10-11
- Cited by
- 2,441
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review