Cited by 2,441

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up

Epstein, Joshua M., Axtell, Robert L.·1996

Abstract

How do social structures and group behaviors arise from the interaction of individuals? Growing Artificial Societies approaches this question with cutting-edge computer simulation techniques. Fundamental collective behaviors such as group formation, cultural transmission, combat, and trade are seen to "emerge" from the interaction of individual agents following a few simple rules. In their program, named Sugarscape, Epstein and Axtell begin the development of a "bottom up" social science that is capturing the attention of researchers and commentators alike. The study is part of the 2050 Project, a joint venture of the Santa Fe Institute, the World Resources Institute, and the Brookings Institution. The project is an international effort to identify conditions for a sustainable global system in the next century and to design policies to help achieve such a system. Copublished with the Brookings Institution Bradford Books imprint

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/3374.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex systems scientists have explored emergent behavior and phase transitions, but not in the context of adversarial AI interactions.

    “Complex systems scientists have explored emergent behavior (Kauffman, 1993;Epstein & Axtell, 1996), and phase transitions (Langton, 1990b), but not in the context of adversarial AI interactions.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L.
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
1996-10-11
Cited by
2,441
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review