The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Developer Dynamics on Fitness in an Evolutionary Ecosystem Model of the App Store
Abstract
Natural ecosystems exhibit complex dynamics of interacting species. Man-made ecosystems exhibit similar dynamics and, in the case of mobile app stores, can be said to perform optimization as developers seek to maximize app downloads. This work aims to understand stability and instability within app store dynamics and how it affects fitness. The investigation is carried out with AppEco, a model of the iOS App Store, which was extended for this paper and updated to model the store from 2008 to 2014. AppEco models apps containing features, developers who build the apps, users who download apps according to their preferences, and an app store that presents apps to the users. It also models developers who use commonly observed strategies to build their apps: innovator, milker, optimizer, copycat, and flexible (the ability to choose any strategy). Results show that despite the success of the copycat strategy, there is a clear stable state for low proportion of copycats in developer populations, mirroring results in theoretical biology for producer-scrounger systems. The results also show that the best fitness is achieved when the evolutionary optimizer (as producer) and copycat (as scrounger) strategies coexist together in stable proportions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When a unique new product or feature enters the ecosystem, copies of it in somewhat altered form follow (e.g., when Flappy Bird was released, many clones appeared in the appstore in the following months [74]).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j · Cited by 2,542
Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1996) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3374.001.0001 · Cited by 2,441
Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up
Duffy, J. F., Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1998) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060800 · Cited by 1,087
Agent-Based Computational Economics: Growing Economies From the Bottom Up
Tesfatsion, L. S. (2002) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/106454602753694765 · Cited by 848
The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations
Minar, N., Burkhart, R., Langton, C. G., & Askenazi, M. (1996) · Cited by 739
Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology
Rehbock, P. F., & Kingsland, S. (1987) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1866630 · Cited by 617
Biological homeostasis of the global environment: the parable of Daisyworld
Watson, A. J., & Lovelock, J. E. (1983) · Tellus B · doi:10.3402/tellusb.v35i4.14616 · Cited by 582
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- lanfranchi, 2010, How to Successfully Market Your IPhone Application
- tesfatsion, 2015, Agent-Based Computational Economics (ACE)
- ray, 1991, An approach to the synthesis of life, Artificial Life II, 371
- lim, 2012, How to become a successful app developer? Lessons from the simulation of an app ecosystem, Proc Genet Evol Comput (GECCO), 129
- 10.1111/j.1600-0889.1983.tb00031.x · DOI
- lim, 2012, From natural to artificial ecosystems, Proc Frontiers Nat Comput, 15
- 10.1109/4235.956714 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda
Jackson, V., Vasilescu, B., Russo, D., Ralph, P., Prikladnicki, R., Izadi, M., D’Angelo, S., Inman, S., Andrade, A., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3708523 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, S. L., Bentley, P. J., & Ishikawa, F.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- National Institute of Informatics (JP)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-545
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0026
- OpenAlex
- W2345110451
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- iOS App Store, mobile app stores, developer strategies, milkers, evolutionary stability, coexistence, fitness, ecosystem dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review