How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology
Abstract
Users have become an integral part of technology studies. The essays in this volume look at the creative capacity of users to shape technology in all phases, from design to implementation. Using a variety of theoretical approaches, including a feminist focus on users and use (in place of the traditional emphasis on men and machines), concepts from semiotics, and the cultural studies view of consumption as a cultural activity, these essays examine what users do with technology and, in turn, what technology does to users. The contributors consider how users consume, modify, domesticate, design, reconfigure, and resist technological development—and how users are defined and transformed by technology. The essays in part I show that resistance to and non-use of a technology can be a crucial factor in the eventual modification and improvement of that technology; examples considered include the introduction of the telephone into rural America and the influence of non-users of the Internet. The essays in part II look at advocacy groups and the many kinds of users they represent, particularly in the context of health care and clinical testing. The essays in part III examine the role of users in different phases of the design, testing, and selling of technology. Included here is an enlightening account of one company's design process for men's and women's shavers, which resulted in a "Ladyshave" for users assumed to be technophobes. Taken together, the essays in How Users Matter show that any understanding of users must take into consideration the multiplicity of roles they play—and that the conventional distinction between users and producers is largely artificial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital tools are locally appropriated, mostly in path-dependent ways, where technology adoption reflects the area's manufacturing and industrial profile and is shaped by local cultural norms and institutional thickness.
“Digital tools are locally appropriated, mostly in path-dependent ways [55], where technology adoption reflects the area's manufacturing and industrial profile and is shaped by local cultural norms [56] and institutional thickness [57].”
From Divergent Paths of SME Digitalization: A Latent Class Approach to Regional Modernization in the European Union (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Geels, F. W. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 · Cited by 4,098 · see citing works
Staying open to interpretation
Sengers, P., & Gaver, B. (2006) · Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems · doi:10.1145/1142405.1142422 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Oudshoorn, N. (2008) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01032.x · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology
Pols, J., & Willems, D. (2011) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x · Cited by 173 · see citing works
The co-constitution of ageing and technology: a model and agenda
Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2021) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x20000641 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health
Papoutsi, C., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., Morrison, C., & Greenhalgh, T. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa197 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances
Mettler, T., Sprenger, M., & Winter, R. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0046-1 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Beyond checklists: toward an ethical-constructive technology assessment
Kiran, A. H., Oudshoorn, N., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2015) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.992769 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Neven, L., & Peine, A. (2017) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc7030026 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Technologies and Health Inequities
Timmermans, S., & Kaufman, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054802 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The technological construction of social power
Brey, P. (2008) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720701773551 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Information rx: prescribing good consumerism and responsible citizenship
Adams, S., & de Bont, A. (2007) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-007-0061-9 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Kirwan, A. (2024) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2023.2284901 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Enactive artificial intelligence: subverting gender norms in human-robot interaction
Hipólito, I., Winkle, K., & Lie, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2023.1149303 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The duality of health technology in chronic illness: how designers envision our future
Lehoux, P. (2008) · Chronic Illness · doi:10.1177/1742395308092475 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zheleva, R., Petkova, K., & Zdravkov, S. (2025) · World · doi:10.3390/world6040144 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-10-10
- OpenAlex
- W4240576039
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- user resistance, semiotics, health technology, clinical testing, gender and technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review