Cited by 68Philosophy and Social TheoryCritical Theory and PhilosophyCybernetics and Technology in Society

The technological construction of social power

Brey, Philip·2008·Social Epistemology

Abstract

This essay presents a theory of the role of technology in the distribution and exercise of social power. The paper studies how technical artefacts and systems are used to construct, maintain or strengthen power relations between agents, whether individuals or groups, and how their introduction and use in society differentially empowers and disempowers agents. The theory is developed in three steps. First, a definition of power is proposed, based on a careful discussion of opposing definitions of power, and it is argued that a theory of power should have two components: a theory of power relations and a theory of empowerment. Second, an analysis of power relations is presented, in which five basic types of power relations between agents are distinguished, and this analysis is applied to technology, resulting in an account of the possible roles of technical artefacts in power relations. Third, I analyse how technology can lead to or contribute to empowerment and disempowerment, and what resistance strategies are possible against disempowerment through technological means. The theory of technology and power presented in this paper is claimed to be an essential ingredient of a critical theory of technology, which is a theory that analyses and critiques the role of technology in the distribution and exercise of power in society. In the final section of this paper, it is argued that the theoretical analysis of power and technology presented in this paper provides an adequate basis for the further development of such a critical theory of technology. I study how it may, specifically, be used to develop strategies for the democratization of technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02691720701773551

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brey, P.
Corresponding author
Brey, Philip
Venue
Social Epistemology
Published
2008-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
71-95
ISSN
  • 0269-1728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5297
OpenAlex
W1971079026
Cited by
68
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Epistemology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy and Social Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
technology and power, social power, power relations, empowerment, disempowerment, technical artifacts, critical theory of technology, resistance strategies, democratization of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review