An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory
Abstract
Emphasizing issues of computational efficiency, Michael Kearns and Umesh Vazirani introduce a number of central topics in computational learning theory for researchers and students in artificial intelligence, neural networks, theoretical computer science, and statistics. Emphasizing issues of computational efficiency, Michael Kearns and Umesh Vazirani introduce a number of central topics in computational learning theory for researchers and students in artificial intelligence, neural networks, theoretical computer science, and statistics. Computational learning theory is a new and rapidly expanding area of research that examines formal models of induction with the goals of discovering the common methods underlying efficient learning algorithms and identifying the computational impediments to learning. Each topic in the book has been chosen to elucidate a general principle, which is explored in a precise formal setting. Intuition has been emphasized in the presentation to make the material accessible to the nontheoretician while still providing precise arguments for the specialist. This balance is the result of new proofs of established theorems, and new presentations of the standard proofs. The topics covered include the motivation, definitions, and fundamental results, both positive and negative, for the widely studied L. G. Valiant model of Probably Approximately Correct Learning; Occam's Razor, which formalizes a relationship between learning and data compression; the Vapni…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For any class of functions H and distribution P, with probability 1 minus delta, for every h in H, the true error and empirical error on an i.i.d. sample of size m differ by at most a VC-dimension bound.
“A standard VC dimension bound (see, e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994]) states:”
From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]
For a data set of size n, with d1=VCDIM(H) and d2=VCDIM(G), the number of labellings induced by H and G is bounded as stated by Sauer's Lemma.
“Lemma 4.3 (Sauer's Lemma (see e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994])) . Let S be a data set of size n . Let d 1 = VCDIM( H ) and d 2 = VCDIM( G ) be the VC-dimensions of the two classes. Then”
From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]
With probability 1-δ, for every f in F_{H,G}, a uniform convergence inequality holds.
“This bound, together with a standard VC-Dimension based uniform convergence theorem (see e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994]) implies that with probability 1 , for every f h;g 2 F H ; G :”
From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]
A rigorous theory for how deep networks generalise might enable principled extrapolation from empirical testing on a limited validation domain to a broader test domain.
“For example, a rigorous theory for how deep networks generalise (as built towards by, e.g., Kearns & Vazirani, 1994;Watanabe, 2009;2018;Mingard et al., 2021;2020) might enable principled extrapolation from empirical testing on a limited validation domain to a broader test domain.”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Kearns & Vazirani, 1994
Computational learning theory investigations have produced various formal guarantees for large classes of learning algorithms, primarily in the form of generalisation guarantees and regret bounds.
“These investigations have produced various formal guarantees for large classes of learning algorithms, primarily in the form of generalisation guarantees and regret bounds.”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Kearns & Vazirani, 1994
These bounds typically show that a given learning algorithm under some given circumstances is guaranteed to attain a given level of performance with at least some given probability, and may also show how these probabilities scale in terms of the amount of training data.
“These bounds typically show that a given learning algorithm under some given circumstances is guaranteed to attain a given level of performance with at least some given probability, and may also show how these probabilities scale in terms of the amount of training data, etc (see e.g.Kearns & Vazirani, 1994).”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Kearns & Vazirani, 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466 · see citing works
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884 · see citing works
The oracle problem in software testing: A survey
Barr, E. T., Harman, M., McMinn, P., Shahbaz, M., & Yoo, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2014.2372785 · Cited by 1,104 · see citing works
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · see citing works
“This is a common approach in computer science, especially for machine learning (Bishop 2006: section 1.5; M. J. Kearns 1994:section 1.2), and also can be found in econometrics (White 1980) and statistics (Buja et al. 2018a; Freedman 1981).”
InfluentialSelf-citationA rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning
Liu, Y., Arunachalam, S., & Temme, K. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01287-z · Cited by 649 · see citing works
FloatBoost learning and statistical face detection
Li, S. Z., & Zhang, Z. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.68 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness
Kearns, M., Neel, S., Roth, A., & Wu, Z. S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05144 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationIterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases
Kalish, M. L., Griffiths, T. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194066 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Guest Column: A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory
Arunachalam, S., & de Wolf, R. (2017) · ACM SIGACT News · doi:10.1145/3106700.3106710 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
Dalrymple, D. "., Skalse, J., Bengio, Y., Russell, S., Tegmark, M., Seshia, S., Omohundro, S., Szegedy, C., Goldhaber, B., Ammann, N., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06624 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Length Generalization Bounds for Transformers
Yang, A., Bergsträßer, P., Zetzsche, G., Chiang, D., & Lin, A. W. (2026) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18800699
- Authors
- Kearns, M. J., & Vazirani, U.
- Affiliations
- AT&T (United States) (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Kearns, Michael J.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1994-08-15
- OpenAlex
- W1520252399
- Cited by
- 1,697
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 16.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
- Keywords
- computational learning theory, PAC learning, Occam's razor, data compression, VC dimension, statistical queries, active learning (machine learning)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review