Cited by 1,697Machine Learning and AlgorithmsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithmssemigroups and automata theory

An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory

Kearns, Michael J., Vazirani, Umesh·1994·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

Emphasizing issues of computational efficiency, Michael Kearns and Umesh Vazirani introduce a number of central topics in computational learning theory for researchers and students in artificial intelligence, neural networks, theoretical computer science, and statistics. Emphasizing issues of computational efficiency, Michael Kearns and Umesh Vazirani introduce a number of central topics in computational learning theory for researchers and students in artificial intelligence, neural networks, theoretical computer science, and statistics. Computational learning theory is a new and rapidly expanding area of research that examines formal models of induction with the goals of discovering the common methods underlying efficient learning algorithms and identifying the computational impediments to learning. Each topic in the book has been chosen to elucidate a general principle, which is explored in a precise formal setting. Intuition has been emphasized in the presentation to make the material accessible to the nontheoretician while still providing precise arguments for the specialist. This balance is the result of new proofs of established theorems, and new presentations of the standard proofs. The topics covered include the motivation, definitions, and fundamental results, both positive and negative, for the widely studied L. G. Valiant model of Probably Approximately Correct Learning; Occam's Razor, which formalizes a relationship between learning and data compression; the Vapni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/3897.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For any class of functions H and distribution P, with probability 1 minus delta, for every h in H, the true error and empirical error on an i.i.d. sample of size m differ by at most a VC-dimension bound.

    “A standard VC dimension bound (see, e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994]) states:”

    From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]

  • For a data set of size n, with d1=VCDIM(H) and d2=VCDIM(G), the number of labellings induced by H and G is bounded as stated by Sauer's Lemma.

    “Lemma 4.3 (Sauer's Lemma (see e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994])) . Let S be a data set of size n . Let d 1 = VCDIM( H ) and d 2 = VCDIM( G ) be the VC-dimensions of the two classes. Then”

    From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]

  • With probability 1-δ, for every f in F_{H,G}, a uniform convergence inequality holds.

    “This bound, together with a standard VC-Dimension based uniform convergence theorem (see e.g. Kearns and Vazirani [1994]) implies that with probability 1 , for every f h;g 2 F H ; G :”

    From Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (2017) · cites this paper as Kearns and Vazirani [1994]

  • A rigorous theory for how deep networks generalise might enable principled extrapolation from empirical testing on a limited validation domain to a broader test domain.

    “For example, a rigorous theory for how deep networks generalise (as built towards by, e.g., Kearns & Vazirani, 1994;Watanabe, 2009;2018;Mingard et al., 2021;2020) might enable principled extrapolation from empirical testing on a limited validation domain to a broader test domain.”

    From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Kearns & Vazirani, 1994

  • Computational learning theory investigations have produced various formal guarantees for large classes of learning algorithms, primarily in the form of generalisation guarantees and regret bounds.

    “These investigations have produced various formal guarantees for large classes of learning algorithms, primarily in the form of generalisation guarantees and regret bounds.”

    From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Kearns & Vazirani, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearns, M. J., & Vazirani, U.
Affiliations
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
1994-08-15
OpenAlex
W1520252399
Cited by
1,697
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 55
FWCI
16.55
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
computational learning theory, PAC learning, Occam's razor, data compression, VC dimension, statistical queries, active learning (machine learning)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review