Cited by 20Visual perception and processing mechanismsAdvanced Vision and ImagingMotor Control and Adaptation

Optic Flow

Warren, William H.·2003·The Visual Neurosciences, 2-vol. set

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/7131.003.0096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensory input cannot be meaningfully interpreted without correcting for self-motion.

    “Sensory input cannot be meaningfully interpreted without correcting for self-motion [29–32]”

    From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, W. H.
Corresponding author
Warren, William H.
Venue
The Visual Neurosciences, 2-vol. set
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2003-11-21
Pages
1247-1259
OpenAlex
W4312303985
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
optical flow, visual motion perception, motion estimation, video analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review