Cited by 154Multisensory perception and integrationVestibular and auditory disordersVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Visual-vestibular cue integration for heading perception: applications of optimal cue integration theory

Open access
Fetsch, Christopher R., DeAngelis, Gregory C., Angelaki, Dora E.·2010·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The perception of self-motion is crucial for navigation, spatial orientation and motor control. In particular, estimation of one's direction of translation, or heading, relies heavily on multisensory integration in most natural situations. Visual and nonvisual (e.g., vestibular) information can be used to judge heading, but each modality alone is often insufficient for accurate performance. It is not surprising, then, that visual and vestibular signals converge frequently in the nervous system, and that these signals interact in powerful ways at the level of behavior and perception. Early behavioral studies of visual-vestibular interactions consisted mainly of descriptive accounts of perceptual illusions and qualitative estimation tasks, often with conflicting results. In contrast, cue integration research in other modalities has benefited from the application of rigorous psychophysical techniques, guided by normative models that rest on the foundation of ideal-observer analysis and Bayesian decision theory. Here we review recent experiments that have attempted to harness these so-called optimal cue integration models for the study of self-motion perception. Some of these studies used nonhuman primate subjects, enabling direct comparisons between behavioral performance and simultaneously recorded neuronal activity. The results indicate that humans and monkeys can integrate visual and vestibular heading cues in a manner consistent with optimal integration theory, and that single neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal area show striking correlates of the behavioral effects. This line of research and other applications of normative cue combination models should continue to shed light on mechanisms of self-motion perception and the neuronal basis of multisensory integration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07207.x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Warren WH Chalupa LM Werner JS 2003 Optic Flow The Visual Neurosciences MIT Press Cambridge, MA 1247 1259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fetsch, C. R., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1721-1729
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1961585049
Cited by
154
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (5-T32-EY13360-07, R01EY019087, EY-019087, EY-016178, T32EY013360, R01EY016178)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC007620, R01DC007620)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
heading perception, visual-vestibular integration, multisensory integration, self-motion perception, Bayesian decision theory, ideal observer, single-unit recording, non-human primates, perceptual illusions, spatial orientation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Humans, Motion Perception, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Visual Perception, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review