The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparse Representation for Signal Classification
Abstract
In this paper, application of sparse representation (factorization) of signals over an overcomplete basis (dictionary) for signal classification is discussed. Searching for the sparse representation of a signal over an overcomplete dictionary is achieved by optimizing an objective function that includes two terms: one that measures the signal reconstruction error and another that measures the sparsity. This objective function works well in applications where signals need to be reconstructed, like coding and denoising. On the other hand, discriminative methods, such as linear discriminative analysis (LDA), are better suited for classification tasks. However, discriminative methods are usually sensitive to corruption in signals due to lacking crucial properties for signal reconstruction. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for signal classification with sparse representation. The approach combines the discrimination power of the discriminative methods with the reconstruction property and the sparsity of the sparse representation that enables one to deal with signal corruptions: noise, missing data and outliers. The proposed approach is therefore capable of robust classification with a sparse representation of signals. The theoretical results are demonstrated with signal classification tasks, showing that the proposed approach outperforms the standard discriminative methods and the standard sparse representation in the case of corrupted signals. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Martinez, A. M., & Kak, A. C. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908974 · Cited by 3,249
Cited by
Supervised Dictionary Learning
Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G., & Zisserman, A. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0809.3083 · Cited by 938
Deep Spatial Feature Reconstruction for Partial Person Re-identification: Alignment-free Approach
He, L., Liang, J., Li, H., & Sun, Z. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00739 · Cited by 341
Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease
Liu, M., Zhang, D., & Shen, D. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.055 · Cited by 313
Computational Health Informatics in the Big Data Age: A Survey
Fang, R., Pouyanfar, S., Yang, Y., Chen, S.-C., & Iyengar, S. S. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2932707 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, K., & Aviyente, S.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-09-07
- Pages
- 609-616
- OpenAlex
- W2146047955
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparse Representation for Signal Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0081
- The paper
- Huang, K., & Aviyente, S. (2007). Sparse Representation for Signal Classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.