Cited by 65Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Begging the Question: The Nonindependence Error in fMRI Data Analysis

Vul, Edward, Kanwisher, Nancy·2010·Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014021.003.0007

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Responses to the sentences and nonwords conditions were estimated using cross-validation across functional runs, ensuring that the data used to estimate the effects were always independent of the data used for ROI definition.

    “The responses to the sentences and nonwords conditions were estimated using cross-validation across the functional runs, and therefore, the data used to estimate the effects were always independent of the data used for ROI definition (46).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vul, E., & Kanwisher, N.
Venue
Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2010-04-30
Pages
71-91
OpenAlex
W92487128
Cited by
65
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
fMRI data analysis, false positives, multiple comparisons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review