Austere Realism: Overcoming Simple Realism’s Problems
Abstract
This chapter continues with the synthesis stage in the dialectic of reflective common sense as started in the previous chapter. It sets forth the theses of austere realism in a way that draws directly upon what is said about truth in the previous chapter, and explains how austere realism can provide natural and reflectively plausible solutions to the problems that undermine simple realism. The specific version of austere realism promoted here incorporates the wider framework of contextual semantics—although the defining theses of austere realism do not presuppose this entire framework, and in principle these theses could be embraced even without embracing all of contextual semantics. The distinction between direct and indirect correspondence fits especially well within this wider semantic framework because the framework treats numerous terms and concepts as governed by implicit contextual parameters, making it natural to treat truth itself this way within the framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EM holds that there exists exactly one concrete particular: the whole cosmos.
“(EM) There exists exactly one concrete particular: the whole cosmos.”
From Priority Cosmopsychism and the Advaita Vedānta (2019) · cites this paper as Horgan and Potrč 2008
Endorsing the phenomenal concept strategy entails losing the motivation for panpsychism.
“However, as in the case of analytic functionalism, endorsing the phenomenal concept strategy entails losing the motivation for panpsychism.”
From Cosmopsychism, Micropsychism and the Grounding Relation (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cosmopsychism, Micropsychism and the Grounding Relation
Goff, P. (2019) · The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism · doi:10.4324/9781315717708-13 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Priority Cosmopsychism and the Advaita Vedānta
Gasparri, L. (2019) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.1353/pew.2019.0002 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horgan, T., & Potrč, M.
- ORCID
- Horgan, Terry
- Venue
- Austere Realism
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- Pages
- 69-90
- OpenAlex
- W2506934973
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- truth, contextual semantics, correspondence theory of truth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review