Cited by 2Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Austere Realism: Overcoming Simple Realism’s Problems

Horgan, Terry, Potrč, Matjaž·2008·Austere Realism

Abstract

This chapter continues with the synthesis stage in the dialectic of reflective common sense as started in the previous chapter. It sets forth the theses of austere realism in a way that draws directly upon what is said about truth in the previous chapter, and explains how austere realism can provide natural and reflectively plausible solutions to the problems that undermine simple realism. The specific version of austere realism promoted here incorporates the wider framework of contextual semantics—although the defining theses of austere realism do not presuppose this entire framework, and in principle these theses could be embraced even without embracing all of contextual semantics. The distinction between direct and indirect correspondence fits especially well within this wider semantic framework because the framework treats numerous terms and concepts as governed by implicit contextual parameters, making it natural to treat truth itself this way within the framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9780262083768.003.0005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EM holds that there exists exactly one concrete particular: the whole cosmos.

    “(EM) There exists exactly one concrete particular: the whole cosmos.”

    From Priority Cosmopsychism and the Advaita Vedānta (2019) · cites this paper as Horgan and Potrč 2008

  • Endorsing the phenomenal concept strategy entails losing the motivation for panpsychism.

    “However, as in the case of analytic functionalism, endorsing the phenomenal concept strategy entails losing the motivation for panpsychism.”

    From Cosmopsychism, Micropsychism and the Grounding Relation (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horgan, T., & Potrč, M.
Venue
Austere Realism
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2008-04-25
Pages
69-90
OpenAlex
W2506934973
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
truth, contextual semantics, correspondence theory of truth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review