Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genome-to-genome analysis of associations between human genetic variation, HIV-1 sequence diversity, and viral control

Open access
Bartha, István, Carlson, Jonathan M, Brumme, Chanson J, McLaren, Paul J, Brumme, Zabrina L, John, Mina, Haas, David W, Martinez-Picado, Javier, Dalmau, Judith, López-Galíndez, Cecilio, Casado, Concepción, Rauch, Andri, Günthard, Huldrych F, Bernasconi, Enos, Vernazza, Pietro, Klimkait, Thomas, Yerly, Sabine, O’Brien, Stephen J, Listgarten, Jennifer, Pfeifer, Nico, Lippert, Christoph, Fusi, Nicolo, Kutalik, Zoltán, Allen, Todd M, Müller, Viktor, Harrigan, P Richard, Heckerman, David, Telenti, Amalio, Fellay, Jacques, for the HIV Genome-to-Genome Study and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study·2013·eLife

Abstract

HIV-1 sequence diversity is affected by selection pressures arising from host genomic factors. Using paired human and viral data from 1071 individuals, we ran >3000 genome-wide scans, testing for associations between host DNA polymorphisms, HIV-1 sequence variation and plasma viral load (VL), while considering human and viral population structure. We observed significant human SNP associations to a total of 48 HIV-1 amino acid variants (p<2.4 × 10−12). All associated SNPs mapped to the HLA class I region. Clinical relevance of host and pathogen variation was assessed using VL results. We identified two critical advantages to the use of viral variation for identifying host factors: (1) association signals are much stronger for HIV-1 sequence variants than VL, reflecting the ‘intermediate phenotype’ nature of viral variation; (2) association testing can be run without any clinical data. The proposed genome-to-genome approach highlights sites of genomic conflict and is a strategy generally applicable to studies of host–pathogen interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.01123

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Bartha, I., Carlson, J. M., Brumme, C. J., McLaren, P. J., Brumme, Z. L., John, M., Haas, D. W., Martinez-Picado, J., Dalmau, J., López-Galíndez, C., Casado, C., Rauch, A., Günthard, H. F., Bernasconi, E., Vernazza, P., Klimkait, T., Yerly, S., O’Brien, S. J., Listgarten, J., Pfeifer, N., Lippert, C., Fusi, N., Kutalik, Z., Allen, T. M., Müller, V., Harrigan, P. R., Heckerman, D., Telenti, A., Fellay, J., & Study, F. T. H. G.-T.-G. S. A. T. S. H. C.
Venue
eLife
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
2
Pages
e01123-e01123
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170066264
Cited by
196
References
2
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome-to-genome analysis of associations between human genetic variation, HIV-1 sequence diversity, and viral control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.01123
The paper
Bartha, I., Carlson, J. M., Brumme, C. J., McLaren, P. J., Brumme, Z. L., John, M., Haas, D. W., Martinez-Picado, J., Dalmau, J., López-Galíndez, C., Casado, C., Rauch, A., Günthard, H. F., Bernasconi, E., Vernazza, P., Klimkait, T., Yerly, S., O’Brien, S. J., Listgarten, J., . . . Study, F. T. H. G.-T.-G. S. A. T. S. H. C. (2013). A genome-to-genome analysis of associations between human genetic variation, HIV-1 sequence diversity, and viral control. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.01123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.