Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,081

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collaboration gets the most out of software

Open access
Morin, Andrew, Eisenbraun, Ben, Key, Jason, Sanschagrin, Paul C, Timony, Michael A, Ottaviano, Michelle, Sliz, Piotr·2013·eLife

Abstract

By centralizing many of the tasks associated with the upkeep of scientific software, SBGrid allows researchers to spend more of their time on research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.01456

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Anderson, 2007, A qualitative study of the implementation of a bioinformatics tool in a biological research laboratory, Intl J Med Inform, 76, 821, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.022 · DOI
  2. Finholt, 2003, Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization, Econ Innov New Technol, 12, 5, 10.1080/10438590303119 · DOI
  3. Foster, 2006, A two-way street to science’s future, Nature, 440, 419, 10.1038/440419a · DOI
  4. Hannay, 2009, How do scientists develop and use scientific software?, Software Eng Comput Sci Eng, 1, 10.1109/SECSE.2009.5069155 · DOI
  5. Morin, 2013, Structural biology computing: Lessons for the biomedical research sciences, Biopolymers, 99, 809, 10.1002/bip.22343 · DOI
  6. Morin, 2012a, Shining light into black boxes, Science, 336, 159, 10.1126/science.1218263 · DOI
  7. Morin, 2012b, A quick guide to software licensing for the scientist-programmer, PLoS Comput Biol, 8, e1002598, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002598 · DOI
  8. O’Donovan, 2012, A grid-enabled web service for low-resolution crystal structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 68, 261, 10.1107/S0907444912001163 · DOI
  9. Pordes, 2007, The open science grid, J Phys: Conf Ser, 78, 012057, 10.1088/1742-6596/78/1/012057 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Schröder, 2010, Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data, Nature, 464, 1218, 10.1038/nature08892 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Stokes-Rees, 2012, Adapting federated cyberinfrastructure for shared data collection facilities in structural biology, J Synchrotron Radiat, 19, 462, 10.1107/S0909049512009776 · DOI
  12. Stokes-Rees, 2010, Protein structure determination by exhaustive search of Protein Data Bank derived databases, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, 21476, 10.1073/pnas.1012095107 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Wassenaar, 2012, WeNMR: structural biology on the grid, J Grid Computing, 10, 743, 10.1007/s10723-012-9246-z · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,081

Metadata

Authors
Morin, A., Eisenbraun, B., Key, J., Sanschagrin, P. C., Timony, M. A., Ottaviano, M., & Sliz, P.
Venue
eLife
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
2
Pages
e01456-e01456
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113904137
Cited by
1,081
References
3
FWCI
74.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.