CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative study of the cryo-EM structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)

Open access
Vazquez-Fernandez, Ester, Yang, Jing, Zhang, Ziguo, Andreeva, Antonina E, Emsley, Paul, Barford, David·2024·eLife
DOI 10.7554/elife.100821.3PMC PMC11473103

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a large multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls progression through the cell cycle by orchestrating the timely proteolysis of mitotic cyclins and other cell cycle regulatory proteins. Although structures of multiple human APC/C complexes have been extensively studied over the past decade, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae APC/C has been less extensively investigated. Here, we describe medium resolution structures of three S. cerevisiae APC/C complexes: unphosphorylated apo-APC/C and the ternary APC/C CDH1 -substrate complex, and phosphorylated apo-APC/C. Whereas the overall architectures of human and S. cerevisiae APC/C are conserved, as well as the mechanism of CDH1 inhibition by CDK-phosphorylation, specific variations exist, including striking differences in the mechanism of coactivator-mediated stimulation of E2 binding, and the activation of APC/C CDC20 by phosphorylation. In contrast to human APC/C in which coactivator induces a conformational change of the catalytic module APC2:APC11 to allow E2 binding, in S. cerevisiae apo-APC/C the catalytic module is already positioned to bind E2. Furthermore, we find no evidence of a phospho-regulatable auto-inhibitory segment of APC1, that in the unphosphorylated human APC/C, sterically blocks the CDC20 C-box binding site of APC8. Thus, although the functions of APC/C are conserved from S. cerevisiae to humans, molecular details relating to their regulatory mechanisms differ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.100821.3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 108

  1. Adams, 2010, PHENIX: a comprehensive python-based system for macromolecular structure solution, Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography, 66, 213, 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alfieri, 2016, Molecular basis of APC/C regulation by the spindle assembly checkpoint, Nature, 536, 431, 10.1038/nature19083 · DOI
  3. Alfieri, 2017, Visualizing the complex functions and mechanisms of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), Open Biology, 7, 10.1098/rsob.170204 · DOI
  4. Alfieri, 2020, A unique binding mode of Nek2A to the APC/C allows its ubiquitination during prometaphase, EMBO Reports, 21, 10.15252/embr.201949831 · DOI
  5. Au, 2002, Implications for the ubiquitination reaction of the anaphase-promoting complex from the crystal structure of the Doc1/Apc10 subunit, Journal of Molecular Biology, 316, 955, 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5399 · DOI
  6. Barford, 2020, Structural interconversions of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) regulate cell cycle transitions, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 61, 86, 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.11.010 · DOI
  7. Bhaskar, 2015, Architecture of the ubiquitylation module of the yeast Ccr4-Not complex, Structure, 23, 921, 10.1016/j.str.2015.03.011 · DOI
  8. Bodrug, 2021, Intricate regulatory mechanisms of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and its role in chromatin regulation, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 9, 10.3389/fcell.2021.687515 · DOI
  9. Brown, 2014, Mechanism of polyubiquitination by human anaphase-promoting complex: RING repurposing for ubiquitin chain assembly, Molecular Cell, 56, 246, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.009 · DOI
  10. Brown, 2015, RING E3 mechanism for ubiquitin ligation to a disordered substrate visualized for human anaphase-promoting complex, PNAS, 112, 5272, 10.1073/pnas.1504161112 · DOI
  11. Brown, 2016, Dual RING E3 architectures regulate multiubiquitination and ubiquitin chain elongation by APC/C, Cell, 165, 1440, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.037 · DOI
  12. Burton, 2001, D box and KEN box motifs in budding yeast Hsl1p are required for APC-mediated degradation and direct binding to Cdc20p and Cdh1p, Genes & Development, 15, 2381, 10.1101/gad.917901 · DOI
  13. Burton, 2007, Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint, Genes & Development, 21, 655, 10.1101/gad.1511107 · DOI
  14. Buschhorn, 2011, Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the coactivator Cdh1 and the processivity factor Doc1, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18, 6, 10.1038/nsmb.1979 · DOI
  15. Cappell, 2018, EMI1 switches from being a substrate to an inhibitor of APC/CCDH1 to start the cell cycle, Nature, 558, 313, 10.1038/s41586-018-0199-7 · DOI
  16. Carroll, 2002, The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex, Nature Cell Biology, 4, 880, 10.1038/ncb871 · DOI
  17. Carroll, 2005, The APC subunit Doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box, Current Biology, 15, 11, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.066 · DOI
  18. Chang, 2014, Molecular architecture and mechanism of the anaphase-promoting complex, Nature, 513, 388, 10.1038/nature13543 · DOI
  19. Chang, 2015, Atomic structure of the APC/C and its mechanism of protein ubiquitination, Nature, 522, 450, 10.1038/nature14471 · DOI
  20. Chao, 2012, Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex, Nature, 484, 208, 10.1038/nature10896 · DOI
  21. Cooper, 2000, Ama1p is a meiosis-specific regulator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome in yeast, PNAS, 97, 14548, 10.1073/pnas.250351297 · DOI
  22. da Fonseca, 2011, Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor, Nature, 470, 274, 10.1038/nature09625 · DOI
  23. Das, 1998, The structure of the tetratricopeptide repeats of protein phosphatase 5: implications for TPR-mediated protein-protein interactions, The EMBO Journal, 17, 1192, 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1192 · DOI
  24. Edgar, 2004, MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity, BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 · DOI
  25. Emsley, 2004, Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics, Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography, 60, 2126, 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ferguson, 2022, APC7 mediates ubiquitin signaling in constitutive heterochromatin in the developing mammalian brain, Molecular Cell, 82, 90, 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.031 · DOI
  27. Foster, 2012, The APC/C subunit Mnd2/Apc15 promotes Cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation, Molecular Cell, 47, 921, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.031 · DOI
  28. Frye, 2013, Electron microscopy structure of human APC/C(CDH1)-EMI1 reveals multimodal mechanism of E3 ligase shutdown, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 20, 827, 10.1038/nsmb.2593 · DOI
  29. Fujimitsu, 2016, Cyclin-dependent kinase 1-dependent activation of APC/C ubiquitin ligase, Science, 352, 1121, 10.1126/science.aad3925 · DOI
  30. Garnett, 2009, UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit, Nature Cell Biology, 11, 1363, 10.1038/ncb1983 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Girard, 2015, An E2 accessory domain increases affinity for the anaphase-promoting complex and ensures E2 competition, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290, 24614, 10.1074/jbc.M115.678193 · DOI
  32. Goddard, 2018, UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis, Protein Science, 27, 14, 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Golan, 2002, The cyclin-ubiquitin ligase activity of cyclosome/APC is jointly activated by protein kinases Cdk1-cyclin B and Plk, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 15552, 10.1074/jbc.M111476200 · DOI
  34. Hall, 2003, Mnd2 and Swm1 are core subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 16698, 10.1074/jbc.M213109200 · DOI
  35. Hall, 2004, Multi-kinase phosphorylation of the APC/C activator Cdh1 revealed by mass spectrometry, Cell Cycle, 3, 1278, 10.4161/cc.3.10.1153 · DOI
  36. Hartooni, 2022, Single-molecule analysis of specificity and multivalency in binding of short linear substrate motifs to the APC/C, Nature Communications, 13, 10.1038/s41467-022-28031-2 · DOI
  37. He, 2013, Insights into degron recognition by APC/C coactivators from the structure of an Acm1-Cdh1 complex, Molecular Cell, 50, 649, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.024 · DOI
  38. Hilioti, 2001, The anaphase inhibitor Pds1 binds to the APC/C-associated protein Cdc20 in a destruction box-dependent manner, Current Biology, 11, 1347, 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00399-2 · DOI
  39. Höckner, 2016, Dual control by Cdk1 phosphorylation of the budding yeast APC/C ubiquitin ligase activator Cdh1, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 27, 2198, 10.1091/mbc.E15-11-0787 · DOI
  40. Höfler, 2024, New Structural Features of the APC/C from High-Resolution, 10.1101/2023.08.31.555674 · DOI
  41. Jin, 2008, Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex, Cell, 133, 653, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.012 · DOI
  42. Keller, 2002, Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search, Analytical Chemistry, 74, 5383, 10.1021/ac025747h · DOI
  43. Kimata, 2008, A role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the APC/C distinct from substrate recruitment, Molecular Cell, 32, 576, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.023 · DOI
  44. King, 1995, A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B, Cell, 81, 279, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90338-0 · DOI
  45. Kraft, 2005, The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates, Molecular Cell, 18, 543, 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.023 · DOI
  46. Kramer, 2000, Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 11, 1555, 10.1091/mbc.11.5.1555 · DOI
  47. Lahav-Baratz, 1995, Reversible phosphorylation controls the activity of cyclosome-associated cyclin-ubiquitin ligase, PNAS, 92, 9303, 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9303 · DOI
  48. Lamb, 1994, Cdc16p, Cdc23p and Cdc27p form a complex essential for mitosis, The EMBO Journal, 13, 4321, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06752.x · DOI
  49. Li, 2016, WD40 domain of Apc1 is critical for the coactivator-induced allosteric transition that stimulates APC/C catalytic activity, PNAS, 113, 10547, 10.1073/pnas.1607147113 · DOI
  50. Lu, 2014, Multiple mechanisms determine the order of APC/C substrate degradation in mitosis, The Journal of Cell Biology, 207, 23, 10.1083/jcb.201402041 · DOI
  51. Mansfeld, 2011, APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment, Nature Cell Biology, 13, 1234, 10.1038/ncb2347 · DOI
  52. Martinez, 2006, Acm1 is a negative regulator of the CDH1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in budding yeast, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 26, 9162, 10.1128/MCB.00603-06 · DOI
  53. Matsumoto, 2010, K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody, Molecular Cell, 39, 477, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.001 · DOI
  54. Matyskiela, 2009, Analysis of activator-binding sites on the APC/C supports a cooperative substrate-binding mechanism, Molecular Cell, 34, 68, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.027 · DOI
  55. Nakane, 2018, Characterisation of molecular motions in cryo-EM single-particle data by multi-body refinement in RELION, eLife, 7, 10.7554/eLife.36861 · DOI
  56. Ng, 2024, Phosphate-binding pocket on cyclin b governs cdk substrate phosphorylation and mitotic timing, 10.1101/2024.02.28.582599 · DOI
  57. Oelschlaegel, 2005, The yeast APC/C subunit Mnd2 prevents premature sister chromatid separation triggered by the meiosis-specific APC/C-Ama1, Cell, 120, 773, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.032 · DOI
  58. Passmore, 2003, Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition, The EMBO Journal, 22, 786, 10.1093/emboj/cdg084 · DOI
  59. Passmore, 2005, Purification and assay of the budding yeast anaphase-promoting complex, Methods in Enzymology, 398, 195, 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)98017-8 · DOI
  60. Penkner, 2005, Mnd2, an essential antagonist of the anaphase-promoting complex during meiotic prophase, Cell, 120, 789, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.017 · DOI
  61. Perkins, 1999, Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data, Electrophoresis, 20, 3551, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  62. Qiao, 2016, Mechanism of APC/CCDC20 activation by mitotic phosphorylation, PNAS, 113, E2570, 10.1073/pnas.1604929113 · DOI
  63. Reimann, 2001, Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc20 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex, Cell, 105, 645, 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00361-0 · DOI
  64. Reimann, 2001, Emi1 regulates the anaphase-promoting complex by a different mechanism than Mad2 proteins, Genes & Development, 15, 3278, 10.1101/gad.945701 · DOI
  65. Rodrigo-Brenni, 2007, Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets, Cell, 130, 127, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.027 · DOI
  66. Rodrigo-Brenni, 2010, Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in E2 and ubiquitin, Molecular Cell, 39, 548, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.027 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Rudner, 2000, Phosphorylation by Cdc28 activates the Cdc20-dependent activity of the anaphase-promoting complex, The Journal of Cell Biology, 149, 1377, 10.1083/jcb.149.7.1377 · DOI
  68. Schreiber, 2011, Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex, Nature, 470, 227, 10.1038/nature09756 · DOI
  69. Schwab, 2001, Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC, The EMBO Journal, 20, 5165, 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5165 · DOI
  70. Schwickart, 2004, Swm1/Apc13 is an evolutionarily conserved subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex stabilizing the association of Cdc16 and Cdc27, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 24, 3562, 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3562-3576.2004 · DOI
  71. Shteinberg, 1999, Phosphorylation of the cyclosome is required for its stimulation by Fizzy/cdc20, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 260, 193, 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0884 · DOI
  72. Sikorski, 1990, A repeating amino acid motif in CDC23 defines A family of proteins and a new relationship among genes required for mitosis and RNA synthesis, Cell, 60, 307, 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90745-z · DOI
  73. Sikorski RS, Michaud WA, Wootton JC, Boguski MS, Connelly C, Hieter P. 1991. TPR proteins as essential components of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. · DOI
  74. Sudakin, 2001, Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2, The Journal of Cell Biology, 154, 925, 10.1083/jcb.200102093 · DOI
  75. Tian, 2012, Structural analysis of human Cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by APC/C, PNAS, 109, 18419, 10.1073/pnas.1213438109 · DOI
  76. Torres, 2007, Mitotic phosphorylation of the anaphase-promoting complex inhibitory subunit Mnd2 is necessary for efficient progression through meiosis i, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 17351, 10.1074/jbc.M610841200 · DOI
  77. Uzunova, 2012, APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 19, 1116, 10.1038/nsmb.2412 · DOI
  78. Van Voorhis, 2014, Activation of the APC/C ubiquitin ligase by enhanced E2 efficiency, Current Biology, 24, 1556, 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.052 · DOI
  79. Vodermaier, 2003, TPR subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex mediate binding to the activator protein CDH1, Current Biology, 13, 1459, 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00581-5 · DOI
  80. Wang, 2009, Insights into anaphase promoting complex TPR subdomain assembly from a CDC26-APC6 structure, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 16, 987, 10.1038/nsmb.1645 · DOI
  81. Waterhouse, 2009, Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench, Bioinformatics, 25, 1189, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  82. Watson, 2019, Posing the APC/C E3 ubiquitin ligase to orchestrate cell division, Trends in Cell Biology, 29, 117, 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.09.007 · DOI
  83. Watson, 2019, Protein engineering of a ubiquitin-variant inhibitor of APC/C identifies a cryptic K48 ubiquitin chain binding site, PNAS, 116, 17280, 10.1073/pnas.1902889116 · DOI
  84. Wendt, 2001, Crystal structure of the APC10/DOC1 subunit of the human anaphase-promoting complex, Nature Structural Biology, 8, 784, 10.1038/nsb0901-784 · DOI
  85. Wickliffe, 2011, The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2, Cell, 144, 769, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.035 · DOI
  86. Williams, 2018, MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation, Protein Science, 27, 293, 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Williamson, 2009, Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex, PNAS, 106, 18213, 10.1073/pnas.0907887106 · DOI
  88. Yamaguchi, 2016, Cryo-EM of mitotic checkpoint complex-bound APC/C reveals reciprocal and conformational regulation of ubiquitin ligation, Molecular Cell, 63, 593, 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.003 · DOI
  89. Yang, 2012, UCSF Chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: an integrated modeling system, Journal of Structural Biology, 179, 269, 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.09.006 · DOI
  90. Yatskevich, 2021, Molecular mechanisms of APC/C release from spindle assembly checkpoint inhibition by APC/C SUMOylation, Cell Reports, 34, 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108929 · DOI
  91. Zachariae, 1996, Identification of subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Science, 274, 1201, 10.1126/science.274.5290.1201 · DOI
  92. Zachariae, 1998, Control of cyclin ubiquitination by CDK-regulated binding of Hct1 to the anaphase promoting complex, Science, 282, 1721, 10.1126/science.282.5394.1721 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Zachariae, 1998, Mass spectrometric analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex from yeast: identification of a subunit related to cullins, Science, 279, 1216, 10.1126/science.279.5354.1216 · DOI
  94. Zhang, 2010, The APC/C subunit Cdc16/Cut9 is a contiguous tetratricopeptide repeat superhelix with a homo-dimer interface similar to Cdc27, The EMBO Journal, 29, 3733, 10.1038/emboj.2010.247 · DOI
  95. Zhang, 2010, Molecular structure of the N-terminal domain of the APC/C subunit Cdc27 reveals a homo-dimeric tetratricopeptide repeat architecture, J Mol Biol, 397, 1316, 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.045 · DOI
  96. Zhang, 2013, The four canonical TPR subunits of human APC/C form related homo-dimeric structures and stack in parallel to form a TPR suprahelix, Journal of Molecular Biology, 425, 4236, 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.004 · DOI
  97. Zhang, 2013, Recombinant expression, reconstitution and structure of human anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C), The Biochemical Journal, 449, 365, 10.1042/BJ20121374 · DOI
  98. Zhang, 2016, Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction, Journal of Structural Biology, 193, 1, 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 · DOI
  99. Zhang, 2016, Recombinant expression and reconstitution of multiprotein complexes by the USER cloning method in the insect cell-baculovirus expression system, Methods, 95, 13, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.003 · DOI
  100. Zhang, 2019, Cyclin A2 degradation during the spindle assembly checkpoint requires multiple binding modes to the APC/C, Nature Communications, 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-11833-2 · DOI
  101. Zheng, 2017, MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy, Nature Methods, 14, 331, 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI
  102. Zivanov, 2018, New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3, eLife, 7, 10.7554/eLife.42166 · DOI
  103. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae apo unphosphorylated APC/C. RCSB Protein Data Bank. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8A5Y. 8A5Y. · DOI
  104. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae apo phosphorylated APC/C. RCSB Protein Data Bank. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8A61. 8A61. · DOI
  105. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae APC/C-Cdh1 complex. RCSB Protein Data Bank. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8A3T. 8A3T. · DOI
  106. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae apo unphosphorylated APC/C. EMDataResource. https://www.emdataresource.org/EMD-15199. EMD-15199.
  107. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae apo phosphorylated APC/C. EMDataResource. https://www.emdataresource.org/EMD-15201. EMD-15201.
  108. Barford D, Fernandez-Vazquez E, Zhang Z, Yang J. 2022. S. cerevisiae APC/C-Cdh1 complex. EMDataResource. https://www.emdataresource.org/EMD-15123. EMD-15123.

Metadata

Authors
Vazquez-Fernandez, E., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Andreeva, A. E., Emsley, P., & Barford, D.
Affiliations
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Barford, David
ORCID
Venue
eLife
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Published
2024-10-14
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.7554/elife.100821.3
PMC
PMC11473103
OpenAlex
W4403381822
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C576/A14109)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UP_1201/6)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
anaphase-promoting complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, E3 ubiquitin ligase, CDH1, CDC20, CDK phosphorylation, cell cycle regulation, protein complex structure
MeSH terms
Humans, Phosphorylation, Protein Conformation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review