Cited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI-enabled alkaline-resistant evolution of protein to apply in mass production

Open access
Kang, Liqi, Wu, Banghao, Zhou, Bingxin, Tan, Pan, Kang, Yun (Kenneth), Yan, Yongzhen, Zong, Yi, Li, Shuang, Liu, Zhuo, Hong, Liang·2025·eLife

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.102788 · Paper page

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been used to study the compositional regularities of proteins in nature, enabling it to assist in protein design to improve the efficiency of protein engineering and reduce manufacturing cost. However, in industrial settings, proteins are often required to work in extreme environments where they are relatively scarce or even non-existent in nature. Since such proteins are almost absent in the training datasets, it is uncertain whether AI model possesses the capability of evolving the protein to adapt extreme conditions. Antibodies are crucial components of affinity chromatography, and they are hoped to remain active at the extreme environments where most proteins cannot tolerate. In this study, we applied an advanced large language model (LLM), the Pro-PRIME model, to improve the alkali resistance of a representative antibody, a VHH antibody capable of binding to growth hormone. Through two rounds of design, we ensured that the selected mutant has enhanced functionality, including higher thermal stability, extreme pH resistance, and stronger affinity, thereby validating the generalized capability of the LLM in meeting specific demands. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first LLM-designed protein product, which is successfully applied in mass production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.102788.3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Abraham, 2015, GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1–2, 19, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bjelkmar, 2010, Implementation of the CHARMM force field in GROMACS: analysis of protein stability effects from correction maps, virtual interaction sites, and water models, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 6, 459, 10.1021/ct900549r · DOI
  3. Bussi, 2007, Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 126, 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
  4. Essmann, 1995, A smooth particle mesh Ewald method, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 103, 8577, 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
  5. Gülich, 2002, Engineering streptococcal protein G for increased alkaline stability, Protein Engineering, 15, 835, 10.1093/protein/15.10.835 · DOI
  6. Hess, 2008, GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 4, 435, 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI
  7. Jaenicke, 1991, Protein stability and molecular adaptation to extreme conditions, European Journal of Biochemistry, 202, 715, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16426.x · DOI
  8. Jang, 2022, Applications of artificial intelligence to enzyme and pathway design for metabolic engineering, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 73, 101, 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.024 · DOI
  9. Jiang, 2024, A general temperature-guided language model to design proteins of enhanced stability and activity, Science Advances, 10, 10.1126/sciadv.adr2641 · DOI
  10. Khersonsky, 2018, Automated design of efficient and functionally diverse enzyme repertoires, Molecular Cell, 72, 178, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033 · DOI
  11. Li, 2023, SESNet: sequence-structure feature-integrated deep learning method for data-efficient protein engineering, Journal of Cheminformatics, 15, 10.1186/s13321-023-00688-x · DOI
  12. Linhult, 2004, Improving the tolerance of a protein a analogue to repeated alkaline exposures using a bypass mutagenesis approach, Proteins, 55, 407, 10.1002/prot.10616 · DOI
  13. Lovelock, 2022, The road to fully programmable protein catalysis, Nature, 606, 49, 10.1038/s41586-022-04456-z · DOI
  14. Lutz, 2018, Protein engineering: past, present, and future, Protein Engineering: Methods and Protocols, 1685, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_1 · DOI
  15. Madani, 2023, Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families, Nature Biotechnology, 41, 1099, 10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Minakuchi, 2013, Remarkable alkaline stability of an engineered protein A as immunoglobulin affinity ligand: C domain having only one amino acid substitution, Protein Science, 22, 1230, 10.1002/pro.2310 · DOI
  17. Narayanan, 2021, Machine learning for biologics: opportunities for protein engineering, developability, and formulation, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 42, 151, 10.1016/j.tips.2020.12.004 · DOI
  18. Palmer, 2008, Design of stability at extreme alkaline pH in streptococcal protein G, Journal of Biotechnology, 134, 222, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.12.009 · DOI
  19. Parrinello, 1981, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method, Journal of Applied Physics, 52, 7182, 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  20. Pinney, 2021, Parallel molecular mechanisms for enzyme temperature adaptation, Science, 371, 10.1126/science.aay2784 · DOI
  21. Qiu, 2023, Artificial intelligence-aided protein engineering: from topological data analysis to deep protein language models, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24, 10.1093/bib/bbad289 · DOI
  22. Rives, 2021, Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences, PNAS, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Sternke, 2019, Consensus sequence design as a general strategy to create hyperstable, biologically active proteins, PNAS, 116, 11275, 10.1073/pnas.1816707116 · DOI
  24. Tan Y, Li M, Tan P, Zhou Z, Yu H, Fan G, Hong L. 2023. PETA: evaluating the impact of protein transfer learning with sub-word tokenization on downstream applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17415. · arXiv
  25. Tokuriki, 2009, Protein dynamism and evolvability, Science, 324, 203, 10.1126/science.1169375 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2022, BayeStab: Predicting effects of mutations on protein stability with uncertainty quantification, Protein Science, 31, 10.1002/pro.4467 · DOI
  27. Weinreich, 2006, Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins, Science, 312, 111, 10.1126/science.1123539 · DOI
  28. Weiß, 2018, Solid-phase agar plate assay for screening amine transaminases, Protein Engineering: Methods and Protocols, 1685, 283, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_17 · DOI
  29. Wijma, 2013, Structure- and sequence-analysis inspired engineering of proteins for enhanced thermostability, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 23, 588, 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.04.008 · DOI
  30. Xia, 2021, Development of thermostable sucrose phosphorylase by semi-rational design for efficient biosynthesis of alpha-D-glucosylglycerol, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 105, 7309, 10.1007/s00253-021-11551-0 · DOI
  31. Xu, 2020, Recent advances in the improvement of enzyme thermostability by structure modification, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 40, 83, 10.1080/07388551.2019.1682963 · DOI
  32. Zhou, 2024, Enhancing efficiency of protein language models with minimal wet-lab data through few-shot learning, Nature Communications, 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-49798-6 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kang, L., Wu, B., Zhou, B., Tan, P., Kang, Y. (., Yan, Y., Zong, Y., Li, S., Liu, Z., & Hong, L.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
  • Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhuo
Venue
eLife
Published
2025-02-19
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402383785
Cited by
0
References
6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12204302)
  • Computational Biology Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (23JS1400600)
  • Shanghai Pujiang Program (22PJ1406900)
  • Startup Fund for Young Faculty at SJTU (SFYF at SJTU)
  • Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SL2022MS018)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (23ZR1431700)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University Scientific and Technological Innovation Funds (21X010200843)
  • Science and Technology Innovation Key R&D Program of Chongqing (CSTB2022TIAD-STX0017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein design, large language models, nanobodies, growth hormone, alkali resistance, thermal stability, binding affinity, affinity chromatography, protein engineering, mass production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review