Cited by 234CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function

Open access
Isaac, R Stefan, Jiang, Fuguo, Doudna, Jennifer A, Lim, Wendell A, Narlikar, Geeta J, Almeida, Ricardo·2016·eLife

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 bacterial surveillance system has become a versatile tool for genome editing and gene regulation in eukaryotic cells, yet how CRISPR-Cas9 contends with the barriers presented by eukaryotic chromatin is poorly understood. Here we investigate how the smallest unit of chromatin, a nucleosome, constrains the activity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We find that nucleosomes assembled on native DNA sequences are permissive to Cas9 action. However, the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA to Cas9 is variable over several orders of magnitude depending on dynamic properties of the DNA sequence and the distance of the PAM site from the nucleosome dyad. We further find that chromatin remodeling enzymes stimulate Cas9 activity on nucleosomal templates. Our findings imply that the spontaneous breathing of nucleosomal DNA together with the action of chromatin remodelers allow Cas9 to effectively act on chromatin in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.13450

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most active CRISPRoff sgRNAs are located in nucleosome-depleted regions of gene promoters.

    “Overlaying nucleosome occupancy with CRISPRoff sgRNA activity scores for all genes showed that the most active sgRNAs are located in nucleosome-depleted regions of gene promoters, as we and others have shown previously for Cas9 and dCas9-based tools (Figures 6J, 6K, S6D and S6E) (Horlbeck et al., 2016b; Isaac et al., 2016).”

    From Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing (2021) · cites this paper as Isaac et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Anders C Jinek M 2014 Chapter One - In Vitro Enzymology of Cas9 Doudna JA Sontheimer EJ Methods in Enzymology Academic Press 546 1 20 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00001-5 PMC5074358 25398333 · DOI
  2. Anderson JD Thåström A Widom J 2002 Spontaneous access of proteins to buried nucleosomal DNA target sites occurs via a mechanism that is distinct from nucleosome translocation Molecular and Cellular Biology 22 7147 7157 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7147-7157.2002 12242292 PMC139820 · DOI
  3. Anderson JD Widom J 2000 Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites Journal of Molecular Biology 296 979 987 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3531 10686097 · DOI
  4. Chen B Gilbert LA Cimini BA Schnitzbauer J Zhang W Li GW Park J Blackburn EH Weissman JS Qi LS Huang B 2013 Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized crispr/cas system Cell 155 1479 1491 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001 24360272 PMC3918502 · DOI
  5. Clapier CR Cairns BR 2009 The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes Annual Review of Biochemistry 78 273 304 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223 19355820 · DOI
  6. Doudna JA Charpentier E 2014 The new frontier of genome engineering with crispr-cas9 Science 346 1258096 10.1126/science.1258096 25430774 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ghorbal M Gorman M Macpherson CR Martins RM Scherf A Lopez-Rubio JJ 2014 Genome editing in the human malaria parasite plasmodium falciparum using the crispr-cas9 system Nature Biotechnology 32 819 821 10.1038/nbt.2925 24880488 · DOI
  8. Haaf T 1995 The effects of 5-azacytidine and 5-azadeoxycytidine on chromosome structure and function: Implications for methylation-associated cellular processes Pharmacology & Therapeutics 65 19 46 10.1016/0163-7258(94)00053-6 7536332 · DOI
  9. He X Fan HY Narlikar GJ Kingston RE 2006 Human ACF1 alters the remodeling strategy of snf2h The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281 28636 28647 10.1074/jbc.M603008200 16877760 · DOI
  10. Hinz JM Laughery MF Wyrick JJ 2015 Nucleosomes inhibit cas9 endonuclease activity in vitro Biochemistry 54 7063 7066 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01108 26579937 · DOI
  11. Horlbeck MA Witkowsky LB Guglielmi B Replogle JM Gilbert LA Villalta JE Torigoe SE Tjian R Weissman JS 2016 Nucleosomes impede cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro eLife 5 10.7554/eLife.12677 PMC4861601 26987018 · DOI
  12. Jiang C Pugh BF 2009 Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: Advances through genomics Nature Reviews. Genetics 10 161 172 10.1038/nrg2522 PMC4860946 19204718 · DOI
  13. Jiang F Zhou K Ma L Gressel S Doudna JA 2015 A cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition Science 348 1477 1481 10.1126/science.aab1452 26113724 · DOI
  14. Jinek M East A Cheng A Lin S Ma E Doudna J 2013 RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells eLife 2 e13450 10.7554/eLife.00471 PMC3557905 23386978 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Josephs EA Kocak DD Fitzgibbon CJ McMenemy J Gersbach CA Marszalek PE 2016 Structure and specificity of the rna-guided endonuclease cas9 during DNA interrogation, target binding and cleavage Nucleic Acids Research 44 2474 10.1093/nar/gkv1293 26578578 PMC4797275 · DOI
  16. Knight SC Xie L Deng W Guglielmi B Witkowsky LB Bosanac L Zhang ET El Beheiry M Masson J-B Dahan M Liu Z Doudna JA Tjian R 2015 Dynamics of crispr-cas9 genome interrogation in living cells Science 350 823 826 10.1126/science.aac6572 26564855 · DOI
  17. Li G Widom J 2004 Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11 763 769 10.1038/nsmb801 15258568 · DOI
  18. Lorch Y Cairns BR Zhang M Kornberg RD 1998 Activated rsc-nucleosome complex and persistently altered form of the nucleosome Cell 94 29–34 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81218-0 9674424 · DOI
  19. Lowary PT Widom J 1998 New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning Journal of Molecular Biology 276 19 42 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494 9514715 · DOI
  20. Luger K Dechassa ML Tremethick DJ 2012 New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: An ordered state or a disordered affair? Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 13 436 447 10.1038/nrm3382 22722606 PMC3408961 · DOI
  21. Luger K Mäder AW Richmond RK Sargent DF Richmond TJ 1997 Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution Nature 389 251 260 10.1038/38444 9305837 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Luger K Rechsteiner TJ Richmond TJ 1999 Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones B.-M. in Enzymology, 304 3 19 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)04003-3 10372352 · DOI
  23. Längst G Bonte EJ Corona DF Becker PB 1999 Nucleosome movement by CHRAC and ISWI without disruption or trans-displacement of the histone octamer Cell 97 843–852 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80797-7 10399913 · DOI
  24. Ma H Naseri A Reyes-Gutierrez P Wolfe SA Zhang S Pederson T 2015 Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 3002 3007 10.1073/pnas.1420024112 25713381 PMC4364232 · DOI
  25. Makarova KS Wolf YI Alkhnbashi OS Costa F Shah SA Saunders SJ Barrangou R Brouns SJ Charpentier E Haft DH Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJ Terns RM Terns MP White MF Yakunin AF Garrett RA van der Oost J Backofen R Koonin EV 2015 An updated evolutionary classification of crispr-cas systems Nature Reviews Microbiology 13 722 736 10.1038/nrmicro3569 PMC5426118 26411297 · DOI
  26. Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM 2013 RNA-guided human genome engineering via cas9 Science 339 823 826 10.1126/science.1232033 23287722 PMC3712628 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Narlikar GJ Phelan ML Kingston RE 2001 Generation and interconversion of multiple distinct nucleosomal states as a mechanism for catalyzing chromatin fluidity Molecular Cell 8 1219 1230 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9 11779498 · DOI
  28. Narlikar GJ Sundaramoorthy R Owen-Hughes T 2013 Mechanisms and functions of atp-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes Cell 154 490–503 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.011 23911317 PMC3781322 · DOI
  29. Olins AL Olins DE 1974 Spheroid chromatin units (ngr bodies) Science 183 330 332 10.1126/science.183.4122.330 4128918 · DOI
  30. Partensky PD Narlikar GJ 2009 Chromatin remodelers act globally, sequence positions nucleosomes locally Journal of Molecular Biology 391 12 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.085 19450608 PMC2813840 · DOI
  31. Polach KJ Widom J 1995 Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: A dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation Journal of Molecular Biology 254 130 149 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0606 7490738 · DOI
  32. Rowe CE Narlikar GJ 2010 The atp-dependent remodeler RSC transfers histone dimers and octamers through the rapid formation of an unstable encounter intermediate Biochemistry 49 9882 9890 10.1021/bi101491u 20853842 PMC2976819 · DOI
  33. Schneider CA Rasband WS Eliceiri KW 2012 NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis Nature Methods 9 671 675 10.1038/nmeth.2089 22930834 PMC5554542 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Schnitzler G Sif S Kingston RE 1998 Human SWI/SNF interconverts a nucleosome between its base state and a stable remodeled state Cell 94 17 27 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81217-9 9674423 · DOI
  35. Smith JD Suresh S Schlecht U Wu M Wagih O Peltz G Davis RW Steinmetz LM Parts L St Onge RP 2016 Quantitative CRISPR interference screens in yeast identify chemical-genetic interactions and new rules for guide RNA design Genome Biology 17 45 10.1186/s13059-016-0900-9 26956608 PMC4784398 · DOI
  36. Sternberg SH LaFrance B Kaplan M Doudna JA 2015 Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by crispr–cas9 Nature 527 110 113 10.1038/nature15544 26524520 PMC4859810 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sternberg SH Redding S Jinek M Greene EC Doudna JA 2014 DNA interrogation by the CRISPR rna-guided endonuclease cas9 Nature 507 62 67 10.1038/nature13011 24476820 PMC4106473 · DOI
  38. Thurman RE Rynes E Humbert R Vierstra J Maurano MT Haugen E Sheffield NC Stergachis AB Wang H Vernot B Garg K John S Sandstrom R Bates D Boatman L Canfield TK Diegel M Dunn D Ebersol AK Frum T Giste E Johnson AK Johnson EM Kutyavin T Lajoie B Lee B-K Lee K London D Lotakis D Neph S Neri F Nguyen ED Qu H Reynolds AP Roach V Safi A Sanchez ME Sanyal A Shafer A Simon JM Song L Vong S Weaver M Yan Y Zhang Z Zhang Z Lenhard B Tewari M Dorschner MO Hansen RS Navas PA Stamatoyannopoulos G Iyer VR Lieb JD Sunyaev SR Akey JM Sabo PJ Kaul R Furey TS Dekker J Crawford GE Stamatoyannopoulos JA 2012 The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome Nature 489 75 82 10.1038/nature11232 22955617 PMC3721348 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Travers A Muskhelishvili G 2005 Bacterial chromatin Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 15 507 514 10.1016/j.gde.2005.08.006 16099644 · DOI
  40. Tóth KF Knoch TA Wachsmuth M Frank-Stöhr M Stöhr M Bacher CP Müller G Rippe K 2004 Trichostatin a-induced histone acetylation causes decondensation of interphase chromatin Journal of Cell Science 117 4277 4287 10.1242/jcs.01293 15292402 · DOI
  41. Vyas VK Barrasa MI Fink GR 2015 A candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families Science Advances 1 10.1126/sciadv.1500248 PMC4428347 25977940 · DOI
  42. Woodcock CLF Safer JP Stanchfield JE 1976 Structural repeating units in chromatin Experimental Cell Research 97 101 110 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90659-5 812708 · DOI
  43. Wu Y Zhang W Jiang J 2014 Genome-wide nucleosome positioning is orchestrated by genomic regions associated with dnase I hypersensitivity in rice PLoS Genetics 10 e13450 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004378 PMC4031139 24852592 · DOI
  44. Yang JG Madrid TS Sevastopoulos E Narlikar GJ 2006 The chromatin-remodeling enzyme ACF is an atp-dependent DNA length sensor that regulates nucleosome spacing Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 13 1078 1083 10.1038/nsmb1170 17099699 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isaac, R. S., Jiang, F., Doudna, J. A., Lim, W. A., Narlikar, G. J., & Almeida, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • QB3 (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lim, Wendell A
  • Narlikar, Geeta J
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-04-28
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2342818826
Cited by
234
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck Fellow of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2201-14)
  • National Science Foundation (1244557)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 DA036858, P50 GM081879, R01 GM073767)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, chromatin remodeling, nucleosome, DNA accessibility, PAM site, nucleosome dyad, genome editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Endonucleases, Nucleosomes, Protein Binding, Recombination, Genetic, Xenopus, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review