Cited by 39Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Long-range regulation of transcription scales with genomic distance in a gene-specific manner

Open access
Jensen, Christina L., Chen, Liang-Fu, Swigut, Tomek, Crocker, Olivia J., Yao, David, Bassik, Mike C., Ferrell, James E., Boettiger, Alistair N. +1 more·2025·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although critical for tuning the timing and level of transcription, enhancer communication with distal promoters is not well understood. Here, we bypass the need for sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) and recruit activators directly using a chimeric array of gRNA oligos to target dCas9 fused to the activator VP64-p65-Rta (CARGO-VPR). We show that this approach achieves effective activator recruitment to arbitrary genomic sites, even those inaccessible when targeted with a single guide. We utilize CARGO-VPR across the Prdm8-Fgf5 locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), where neither gene is expressed. Although activator recruitment to any tested region results in the transcriptional induction of at least one gene, the expression level strongly depends on the genomic distance between the promoter and activator recruitment site. However, the expression-distance relationship for each gene scales distinctly in a manner not attributable to differences in 3D contact frequency, promoter DNA sequence, or the presence of repressive chromatin marks at the locus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.10.021

Cites

60 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of genomic context for long-range regulatory effects is corroborated by the distinct scaling with genomic distance between Sox2 and Car2 and by observations at other loci.

    “Long-range regulatory effects scaled distinctly with genomic distance between Sox2 and Car2, corroborating the importance of genomic context observed at other loci (56).”

    From Synergy between regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results report distinct expression–distance scaling for Prdm8 and Fgf5, and the Discussion concludes that genomic context beyond the promoter contributes to gene-specific scaling (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not support the claim’s specific comparison between Sox2 and Car2. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [40]Pulecio J, Tayyebi Z, Liu D, Wong W, Luo R, Damodaran JR, Kaplan S, Cho H, Yan J, Murphy D, (2023). Discovery of Competent Chromatin Regions in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. bioRxiv.
  2. [54]Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, and Roder JC (1993). by STANFORD UNIVERSITY SERIALS DEPARTMENT on December 30. Dev. Biol 90, 8424– 8428. PMC47369 8378314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, C. L., Chen, L.-F., Swigut, T., Crocker, O. J., Yao, D., Bassik, M. C., Ferrell, J. E., Boettiger, A. N., & Wysocka, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wysocka, Joanna
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
347-361.e7
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404919685
Cited by
39
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health Office of the Director
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
long-range transcriptional regulation, enhancer-promoter interactions, genomic distance, gene-specific regulation, dCas9, mouse embryonic stem cells, repressive chromatin, transcriptional induction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review